Showing papers by "Joel M. Reid published in 2012"

Phase I/II Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cixutumumab in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors and Ewing Sarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

Abstract: Purpose A phase I/II study of cixutumumab (IMC-A12) in children with refractory solid tumors was conducted. This study was designed to assess the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cixutumumab in children to determine a recommended phase II dose and to assess antitumor activity in Ewing sarcoma (ES). Patients and Methods Pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors were treated with cixutumumab as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once per week. Two dose levels—6 and 9 mg/kg—were evaluated using a standard three-plus-three cohort design. Patients with refractory ES were treated in an expanded phase II cohort at each dose level. Results Forty-seven eligible patients with a median age of 15 years (range, 4 to 28 years) were enrolled. Twelve patients were treated in the dose-finding phase. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild and infrequent. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 thrombocytopenia at 6 mg/kg and grade 3 dehydration at 9 mg/kg. Mean tro...

Phase I Study of Vorinostat in Combination with Temozolomide in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 04-03

Abstract: Purpose: A phase I, dose-finding study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). Experimental Design: This phase I, dose-finding, investigational study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 was a dose-escalation study of vorinostat in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m 2 /day for 5 days every 28 days. Part 2 was a dose-escalation study of vorinostat in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m 2 /day for 5 days of the first cycle and 200 mg/m 2 /day for 5 days of the subsequent 28-day cycles. Results: In part 1, the MTD of vorinostat administered on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of every 28-day cycle, in combination with TMZ, was 500 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade 3 anorexia, grade 3 ALT, and grade 5 hemorrhage in the setting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In part 2, the MTD of vorinostat on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of every 28-day cycle, combined with TMZ, was 400 mg daily. No DLTs were encountered, but vorinostat dosing could not be escalated further due to thrombocytopenia. The most common serious adverse events were fatigue, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and thromboembolic events. There were no apparent pharmacokinetic interactions between vorinostat and TMZ. Vorinostat treatment resulted in hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 in peripheral mononuclear cells. Conclusion: Vorinostat in combination with temozolomide is well tolerated in patients with HGG. A phase I/II trial of vorinostat with radiotherapy and concomitant TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma is underway. Clin Cancer Res; 18(21); 6032–9. ©2012 AACR .

Tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of a sunitinib powder formulation in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a Children’s Oncology Group study

Abstract: Sunitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF, c-KIT, and flt-3 receptors. A pediatric phase I study of sunitinib capsules identified the maximum tolerated dose as 15 mg/m2/day. This study was conducted to evaluate sunitinib given as a powder formulation. Sunitinib 15 mg/m2 was administered orally daily for 4 weeks on/2 weeks off to patients <21 years old with refractory solid tumors. Sunitinib capsules were opened, and the powder sprinkled onto applesauce or yogurt. Plasma levels of sunitinib and an active metabolite, SU12662, were measured, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. 12 patients, median age 13 (range 4–21) years, were treated. The most common first-cycle toxicities were leucopenia (n = 6), fatigue (n = 5), neutropenia (n = 4), and hypertension (n = 4). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1 (dizziness/back pain, hand–foot syndrome, and intratumoral hemorrhage/hypoxia). A median peak plasma sunitinib concentration of 21 (range 6–36) ng/ml was reached at a median of 4 (range 4–8) h after the first dose. The median exposure (AUC0–48) was 585 (range 196–1,059) h ng/l. The median half-life was 23 (range 13–36) h. The median trough concentration measured before day 14 dosing was 32 (range 12–58) ng/ml. The pharmacokinetic profile of sunitinib appears similar between a powder formulation and published data using capsules. The powder formulation allows patients unable to swallow capsules to receive sunitinib.

Phase i study of temsirolimus in combination with EKB-569 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract: Purpose Activation of EGFR can stimulate proliferative and survival signaling through mTOR Preclinical data demonstrates synergistic activity of combined EGFR and mTOR inhibition We undertook a phase I trial of temsirolimus (T, an mTOR inhibitor) and EKB-569 (E, an EGFR inhibitor) to determine the safety and tolerability Methods The primary aim was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination in adults with solid tumors Following the dose-escalation phase, (Cohort A), two subsequent cohorts were used to assess any pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between the agents Results Forty eight patients were enrolled The MTD of this combination was E, 35 mg daily and T, 30 mg on days 1–3 and 15–17 using a 28-day cycle The most common toxicities were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, stomatitis, rash, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypertriglyceridemia Sixteen patients (36%) had at least one grade 3 toxicity The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea, dehydration, and nausea and vomiting (19% each) No grade 5 events were seen Four patients had a partial response and 15 had stable disease Clinical benefit was seen across a range of tumor types and in all cohorts PK analysis revealed no significant interaction between E and T Conclusions This combination of agents is associated with tolerable toxicities at doses that induced responses PK studies revealed no interaction between the drugs Further investigations of this targeting strategy may be attractive in renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, alveolar sarcoma, and carcinoid tumor

A Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Aflibercept (VEGF Trap) in Children with Refractory Solid Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report

Abstract: Purpose: Aflibercept is a novel decoy receptor that efficiently neutralizes circulating VEGF. A pediatric phase I trial was conducted to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of aflibercept. Experimental Design: Cohorts of three to six children with refractory solid tumors received aflibercept intravenously over 60 minutes every 14 days, at 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 mg/kg/dose. PK sampling and analysis of peripheral blood biomarkers were conducted with the initial dose. Results: Twenty-one eligible patients were enrolled; 18 were fully evaluable for toxicity. One of six patients receiving 2.0 mg/kg/dose developed dose-limiting intratumoral hemorrhage and two of six receiving 3.0 mg/kg/dose developed either dose-limiting tumor pain or tissue necrosis. None of the six patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg/dose developed DLTs, defining this as the MTD. The most common non-DLTs were hypertension and fatigue. Three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma and clear cell sarcoma had stable disease for >13 weeks. At the MTD, the ratio of free-to-bound aflibercept serum concentration was 2.10 on day 8 but only 0.44 by day 15. A rapid decrease in VEGF ( P < 0.05) and increase in placental growth factor (PlGF; P < 0.05) from baseline was observed in response to aflibercept by day 2. Conclusions: The aflibercept MTD in children of 2.5 mg/kg/dose every 14 days is lower than the adult recommended dose of 4.0 mg/kg. This dose achieves, but does not sustain, free aflibercept concentrations in excess of bound. Tumor pain and hemorrhage may be evidence of antitumor activity but were dose-limiting. Clin Cancer Res; 1–9. ©2012 AACR .

Gemcitabine and docetaxel for hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group clinical trial.

Abstract: ObjectivesFew effective options are available for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several phase I trials suggest promising activity of a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel.MethodsPatients with unresectable or metastatic HCC were treated with docetaxel 40 mg/m2 (la

Abstract PD10-08: Venlafaxine inhibits the CYP2D6 mediated metabolic activation of tamoxifen: Results of a prospective multicenter study: (NCT00667121)

Abstract: Background: CYP2D6 is the rate limiting enzyme responsible for the metabolic activation of tamoxifen (tam) to endoxifen. Compared to CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM), tam-treated CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) have higher endoxifen concentrations, more vasomotor symptoms (Goetz, MP J Clin Oncol 2005), and are more likely to discontinue tam (Rae, JM 2009. Pharmacogenomics J). Additionally, higher endoxifen concentrations are associated with a stepwise increase in tam side-effects (Lorizio, W Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012). The data regarding CYP2D6 genotype and recurrence is mixed. Venlafaxine is a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor not known to alter tam pharmacokinetics (PK) and commonly recommended for tam induced hot flashes. We conducted a multicenter pharmacological study to determine whether venlafaxine altered the PK of tam and to determine the distribution of CYP2D6 genotypes in this population Methods: Women taking tam for at least 4 weeks and for whom venlafaxine was recommended for the treatment of hot flashes were eligible. Blood samples were collected prior to and 8–16 weeks following initiation of venlafaxine for steady state tam and metabolites. Genotyping was performed for alleles associated with no (PM; *3, *4, *5,*6); reduced (intermediate, IM; *10, 17 and *41); and ultra-rapid (UM; *1×2) metabolism. Power calculations demonstrated that 17 patients with paired samples were required (two-sided alpha=0.05 t-test, 90% power) to detect a 25% change in endoxifen levels after at least 8 weeks of concurrent treatment. Results: 30 women (median age 48.5) initiated venlafaxine. CYP2D6 genotypes were within Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE). CYP2D6 UM allele frequency (6.7%) was higher while CYP2D6 *4 (13.3%) was lower than expected compared to an unselected population (0.5 and 21% respectively; Sachse Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997), resulting in the absence of CYP2D6 PM/PM. Mean (min/max) baseline endoxifen concentrations (8.73; 1.5–20.5 ng/ml) were correlated with CYP2D6 phenotype as follows: intermediate (EM/PM, PM/IM): 6.8 (1.5–11.2); extensive (EM/EM, EM/IM): 9.4 (1.5–20.5) and ultra-rapid (UM/EM: 11.0; 7.8–14) (r2 = 0.35 p = 0.05). In patients with paired samples (n = 20), venlafaxine resulted in a 23% decrease in endoxifen (−2.06 ng/ml; 95% CI −0.69 to −3.04; p = 0.004), but not tam, NDMT, or 4HT concentrations. Following initiation of venlafaxine, CYP2D6 genotype was no longer associated with endoxifen concentrations (r2 = 0.28 p = 0.23). For women with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism [EM/PM (n = 9) or PM/IM (n = 1)], venlafaxine lowered endoxifen concentrations (−2.98 ng/ml) to a level (5.41 ng/ml) reported to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence in adjuvant tam treated patients (Madlensky, L Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011). Conclusions: In this study, women with tam-induced vasomotor symptoms requiring venlafaxine were comprised predominantly of CYP2D6 EM and UM metabolizers. Venlafaxine significantly decreased endoxifen concentrations. Although the optimal concentration of endoxifen is unknown, given prior data linking low endoxifen concentrations with recurrence, venlafaxine should be used with caution in tam treated patients. (Supported by R01CA133049) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-08.