scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "John Douglas Mcpherson published in 2012"


Journal ArticleDOI
Andrew V. Biankin1, Andrew V. Biankin2, Andrew V. Biankin3, Nicola Waddell4, Karin S. Kassahn4, Marie-Claude Gingras5, Lakshmi Muthuswamy6, Amber L. Johns3, David Miller4, Peter Wilson4, Ann-Marie Patch4, Jianmin Wu3, David K. Chang1, David K. Chang3, David K. Chang2, Mark J. Cowley3, Brooke Gardiner4, Sarah Song4, Ivon Harliwong4, Senel Idrisoglu4, Craig Nourse4, Ehsan Nourbakhsh4, Suzanne Manning4, Shivangi Wani4, Milena Gongora4, Marina Pajic3, Christopher J. Scarlett3, Christopher J. Scarlett7, Anthony J. Gill3, Anthony J. Gill8, Anthony J. Gill9, Andreia V. Pinho3, Ilse Rooman3, Matthew J. Anderson4, Oliver Holmes4, Conrad Leonard4, Darrin Taylor4, Scott Wood4, Qinying Xu4, Katia Nones4, J. Lynn Fink4, Angelika N. Christ4, Timothy J. C. Bruxner4, Nicole Cloonan4, Gabriel Kolle10, Felicity Newell4, Mark Pinese3, R. Scott Mead11, R. Scott Mead3, Jeremy L. Humphris3, Warren Kaplan3, Marc D. Jones3, Emily K. Colvin3, Adnan Nagrial3, Emily S. Humphrey3, Angela Chou11, Angela Chou3, Venessa T. Chin3, Lorraine A. Chantrill3, Amanda Mawson3, Jaswinder S. Samra8, James G. Kench12, James G. Kench9, James G. Kench3, Jessica A. Lovell3, Roger J. Daly3, Neil D. Merrett1, Neil D. Merrett9, Christopher W. Toon3, Krishna Epari13, Nam Q. Nguyen14, Andrew Barbour4, Nikolajs Zeps15, Nipun Kakkar5, Fengmei Zhao5, Yuan Qing Wu5, Min Wang5, Donna M. Muzny5, William E. Fisher5, F. Charles Brunicardi16, Sally E. Hodges5, Jeffrey G. Reid5, Jennifer Drummond5, Kyle Chang5, Yi Han5, Lora Lewis5, Huyen Dinh5, Christian J. Buhay5, Timothy Beck6, Lee Timms6, Michelle Sam6, Kimberly Begley6, Andrew M.K. Brown6, Deepa Pai6, Ami Panchal6, Nicholas Buchner6, Richard de Borja6, Robert E. Denroche6, Christina K. Yung6, Stefano Serra17, Nicole Onetto6, Debabrata Mukhopadhyay18, Ming-Sound Tsao17, Patricia Shaw17, Gloria M. Petersen18, Steven Gallinger17, Steven Gallinger19, Ralph H. Hruban20, Anirban Maitra20, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue20, Richard D. Schulick20, Christopher L. Wolfgang20, Richard A. Morgan20, Rita T. Lawlor, Paola Capelli21, Vincenzo Corbo, Maria Scardoni21, Giampaolo Tortora, Margaret A. Tempero22, Karen M. Mann23, Nancy A. Jenkins23, Pedro A. Perez-Mancera24, David J. Adams25, David A. Largaespada26, Lodewyk F. A. Wessels27, Alistair G. Rust25, Lincoln Stein6, David A. Tuveson24, Neal G. Copeland23, Elizabeth A. Musgrove2, Elizabeth A. Musgrove3, Aldo Scarpa21, James R. Eshleman20, Thomas J. Hudson6, Robert L. Sutherland2, Robert L. Sutherland3, David A. Wheeler5, John V. Pearson4, John Douglas Mcpherson6, Richard A. Gibbs5, Sean M. Grimmond4 
15 Nov 2012-Nature
TL;DR: It is found that frequent and diverse somatic aberrations in genes described traditionally as embryonic regulators of axon guidance, particularly SLIT/ROBO signalling, are also evident in murine Sleeping Beauty transposon-mediated somatic mutagenesis models of pancreatic cancer, providing further supportive evidence for the potential involvement ofAxon guidance genes in pancreatic carcinogenesis.
Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy with few effective therapies. We performed exome sequencing and copy number analysis to define genomic aberrations in a prospectively accrued clinical cohort (n = 142) of early (stage I and II) sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Detailed analysis of 99 informative tumours identified substantial heterogeneity with 2,016 non-silent mutations and 1,628 copy-number variations. We define 16 significantly mutated genes, reaffirming known mutations (KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, MLL3, TGFBR2, ARID1A and SF3B1), and uncover novel mutated genes including additional genes involved in chromatin modification (EPC1 and ARID2), DNA damage repair (ATM) and other mechanisms (ZIM2, MAP2K4, NALCN, SLC16A4 and MAGEA6). Integrative analysis with in vitro functional data and animal models provided supportive evidence for potential roles for these genetic aberrations in carcinogenesis. Pathway-based analysis of recurrently mutated genes recapitulated clustering in core signalling pathways in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and identified new mutated genes in each pathway. We also identified frequent and diverse somatic aberrations in genes described traditionally as embryonic regulators of axon guidance, particularly SLIT/ROBO signalling, which was also evident in murine Sleeping Beauty transposon-mediated somatic mutagenesis models of pancreatic cancer, providing further supportive evidence for the potential involvement of axon guidance genes in pancreatic carcinogenesis.

1,752 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The technology underlying cancer genomics is highlighted and the early results of genome sequencing and the challenges met in the discovery of new genetic aberrations are examined.
Abstract: In recent years, the increasing awareness that somatic mutations and other genetic aberrations drive human malignancies has led us within reach of personalized cancer medicine (PCM). The implementation of PCM is based on the following premises: genetic aberrations exist in human malignancies; a subset of these aberrations drive oncogenesis and tumor biology; these aberrations are actionable (defined as having the potential to affect management recommendations based on diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive implications); and there are highly specific anticancer agents available that effectively modulate these targets. This article highlights the technology underlying cancer genomics and examines the early results of genome sequencing and the challenges met in the discovery of new genetic aberrations. Finally, drawing from experiences gained in a feasibility study of somatic mutation genotyping and targeted exome sequencing led by Princess Margaret Hospital‐University Health Network and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, the processes, challenges, and issues involved in the translation of cancer genomics to the clinic are discussed. J Clin Oncol 30:647-660. © 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

178 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The factor induced reprogramming stress contributes to a significant proportion of the mutation load of iPSCs, and simulation suggests that the mutation intensity during reprograming is ninefold higher than the background mutation rate in culture.
Abstract: Mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) pose a risk for their clinical use due to preferential reprogramming of mutated founder cell and selection of mutations during maintenance of iPSCs in cell culture. It is unknown, however, if mutations in iPSCs are due to stress associated with oncogene expression during reprogramming. We performed whole exome sequencing of human foreskin fibroblasts and their derived iPSCs at two different passages. We found that in vitro passaging contributed 7% to the iPSC coding point mutation load, and ultradeep amplicon sequencing revealed that 19% of the mutations preexist as rare mutations in the parental fibroblasts suggesting that the remaining 74% of the mutations were acquired during cellular reprogramming. Simulation suggests that the mutation intensity during reprogramming is ninefold higher than the background mutation rate in culture. Thus the factor induced reprogramming stress contributes to a significant proportion of the mutation load of iPSCs.

169 citations