scispace - formally typeset
J

John T. Wei

Researcher at University of Michigan

Publications -  395
Citations -  32685

John T. Wei is an academic researcher from University of Michigan. The author has contributed to research in topics: Prostate cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 82, co-authored 385 publications receiving 30140 citations. Previous affiliations of John T. Wei include Johns Hopkins University & United States Department of Veterans Affairs.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrent assessment of obstructive/irritative urinary symptoms and incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

TL;DR: Urinary incontinence was more common in the radical prostatectomy group, but differences were not seen for obstructive symptoms, suggesting that these symptoms should also be assessed after radical prostateCTomy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The association of Incontinence Symptom Index scores with urethral function and support.

TL;DR: C categories of symptom severity assessed by the ISI are associated with urethral function and support and are found in women with mild, moderate, and severe symptoms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Two-Stage Biomarker Protocols for Improving the Precision of Early Detection of Prostate Cancer.

TL;DR: Two-stage biomarker screening strategies using new biomarkers with risk thresholds optimized for high-grade cancer detection may increase quality-adjusted survival and reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluative care guideline compliance is associated with provision of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery.

TL;DR: Urologists who tend to follow the AUA best practice guidelines for BPH evaluation perform surgical interventions on their BPH patients less frequently than urologist who do not follow these guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality of care and performance-based reimbursement: the contemporary landscape and implications for urologists.

TL;DR: Quality-of-care research and performanceased reimbursement initiatives have focused on ommon, chronic medical conditions outside the rologic domain, but have included few urology-speific indicators in their assessment framework.