K
Kai Lingemann
Researcher at University of Osnabrück
Publications - 61
Citations - 3025
Kai Lingemann is an academic researcher from University of Osnabrück. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mobile robot & Simultaneous localization and mapping. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 56 publications receiving 2863 citations. Previous affiliations of Kai Lingemann include Fraunhofer Society.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
6D SLAM—3D mapping outdoor environments
TL;DR: This paper presents a robotic mapping method based on locally consistent 3D laser range scans that combines Iterative Closest Point scan matching, combined with a heuristic for closed loop detection and a global relaxation method, results in a highly precise mapping system.
Journal ArticleDOI
The 3D Hough Transform for plane detection in point clouds: A review and a new accumulator design
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluate different variants of the Hough Transform with respect to their applicability to detect planes in 3D point clouds reliably, and present a novel approach to design the accumulator focusing on achieving the same size for each cell and compare it to existing designs.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
6D SLAM with an application in autonomous mine mapping
TL;DR: A new solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem with six degrees of freedom with a fast variant of the Iterative Closest Points algorithm registers the 3D scans in a common coordinate system and relocalizes the robot.
Journal ArticleDOI
Globally consistent 3D mapping with scan matching
TL;DR: This article describes the extension of the proposed algorithm to deal with these additional DoFs and the resulting non-linearities and yields a fast application that handles the massive amount of 3D data and the computational requirements due to the 6DoF.
Journal ArticleDOI
High-speed laser localization for mobile robots
TL;DR: A novel, laser-based approach for tracking the pose of a high-speed mobile robot that is outstanding in terms of accuracy and computation time and compared to standard scan matching methods in indoor and outdoor environments.