scispace - formally typeset
K

Kevin de Queiroz

Researcher at National Museum of Natural History

Publications -  340
Citations -  14266

Kevin de Queiroz is an academic researcher from National Museum of Natural History. The author has contributed to research in topics: Clade & Phylogenetic tree. The author has an hindex of 44, co-authored 334 publications receiving 13194 citations. Previous affiliations of Kevin de Queiroz include American Museum of Natural History & University of California, Berkeley.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species

TL;DR: Reconciliation of incompatible species definitions and the development of a unified species concept require rejecting the interpretation of various contingent properties of metapopulation lineages, including intrinsic reproductive isolation in Mayr's definition, as necessary properties of species.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names.

TL;DR: Defining the names of taxa in terms of common ancestry, that is, using phylogenetic definitions of taxon names, departs from a tradition of character-based definitions by granting the concept of evolution a central role in taxonomy.

The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals

TL;DR: The evolution of the amniotic egg was one of the great evolutionary innovations in the history of life, freeing vertebrates from an obligatory connection to water and thus permitting the conquest of terrestrial environments as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature

TL;DR: The development of a phylogenetic system of nomenclature requires reformulating these concepts and principles so that they are no longer based on the Linnean categories but on the tenet of common descent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem

TL;DR: Examination of species concepts that focus either on interbreeding or on common descent leads us to conclude that several alternatives are acceptable from the standpoint of phylogenetic systematics but that no one species concept can meet the needs of all comparative biologists.