K
Konrad Schnabel
Researcher at University of Potsdam
Publications - 29
Citations - 1813
Konrad Schnabel is an academic researcher from University of Potsdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Implicit-association test & Big Five personality traits. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 26 publications receiving 1606 citations. Previous affiliations of Konrad Schnabel include Humboldt University of Berlin & Free University of Berlin.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement
Brian A. Nosek,Frederick L. Smyth,N. Sriram,Nicole M. Lindner,Thierry Devos,Alfonso Ayala,Yoav Bar-Anan,Robin Bergh,Huajian Cai,Karen Gonsalkorale,Selin Kesebir,Norbert Maliszewski,Félix Neto,Eero Olli,Jaihyun Park,Konrad Schnabel,Kimihiro Shiomura,Bogdan Tudor Tulbure,Reinout W. Wiers,Mónika Somogyi,Nazar Akrami,Bo Ekehammar,Michelangelo Vianello,Mahzarin R. Banaji,Anthony G. Greenwald +24 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that implicit stereotypes and sex differences in science participation and performance are mutually reinforcing, contributing to the persistent gender gap in science engagement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessment of implicit personality self-concept using the implicit association test (IAT): concurrent assessment of anxiousness and angriness.
TL;DR: The sequence of an anxiousness and an angriness IAT was counterbalanced across 100 participants and the IATs' predictive validity for anxious versus angry behaviour after emotion inductions was examined and compared to direct self-report measures.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the psychometric properties of the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST) as adapted for the measurement of the implicit self-concept of personality.
Journal ArticleDOI
Employing automatic approach and avoidance tendencies for the assessment of implicit personality self-concept: The implicit association procedure (IAP).
TL;DR: IAT and IAP were unaffected by position effects, and were less susceptible to faking than direct self-ratings with regard to mean levels and correlates, and indirect measures are more robust against faking but do not yet meet psychometric criteria for practical assessment purposes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessment of Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition A Review of IAT Measures
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss basic features of Implicit association tests (IATs) that are relevant in order to estimate their suitability of IATs for the valid assessment of individual differences.