L
Lyle E. Baade
Researcher at University of Kansas
Publications - 37
Citations - 4279
Lyle E. Baade is an academic researcher from University of Kansas. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cognition & Neurocognitive. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 37 publications receiving 3687 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Part 1: Test Selection, Reliability, and Validity
Keith H. Nuechterlein,Michael F. Green,Robert S. Kern,Lyle E. Baade,M Deanna,Jonathan D. Cohen,Susan M. Essock,Wayne S. Fenton,Frederick J. Frese,James M. Gold,Terry E. Goldberg,Robert K. Heaton,Richard S.E. Keefe,Helena C. Kraemer,Raquelle I. Mesholam-Gately,Larry J. Seidman,Ellen Stover,Daniel R. Weinberger,Alexander S. Young,Steven Zalcman,Stephen R. Marder +20 more
TL;DR: The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is expected to be the standard tool for assessing cognitive change in clinical trials of cognition-enhancing drugs for schizophrenia and may also aid evaluation of cognitive remediation strategies.
Journal ArticleDOI
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization.
Robert S. Kern,Keith H. Nuechterlein,Michael F. Green,Lyle E. Baade,Wayne S. Fenton,James M. Gold,Richard S.E. Keefe,Raquelle I. Mesholam-Gately,Jim Mintz,Larry J. Seidman,Ellen Stover,Stephen R. Marder +11 more
TL;DR: The consensus cognitive battery developed by the National Institute of Mental Health's (NIMH) Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative includes 10 independently developed tests that are recommended as the standard battery for clinical trials of cognitionenhancing interventions for schizophrenia as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Neuropsychological test results associated with psychiatric disorders in adults.
TL;DR: This review addresses the question of whether neuropsychological tests can be used to discriminate between cerebral dysfunction and nonorganic psychiatric disorders by considering 94 studies that compared test scores of psychiatric patients with scores of brain-damaged patients or with established norms for organicity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reliable Digit Span: a systematic review and cross-validation study.
TL;DR: Overall, caution should be used when utilize the ≤7 cutoff in all clinical groups and when utilizing the ≤6 cutoff in the following groups: cerebrovascular accident, severe memory disorders, mental retardation, borderline intellectual functioning, and English as a second language.
Journal ArticleDOI
The MCCB Impairment Profile for Schizophrenia Outpatients: Results From the MATRICS Psychometric and Standardization Study
Robert S. Kern,Robert S. Kern,James M. Gold,Dwight Dickinson,Michael F. Green,Michael F. Green,Keith H. Nuechterlein,Keith H. Nuechterlein,Lyle E. Baade,Richard S.E. Keefe,Raquelle I. Mesholam-Gately,Larry J. Seidman,Larry J. Seidman,Catherine Lee,Catherine A. Sugar,Catherine A. Sugar,Stephen R. Marder,Stephen R. Marder +17 more
TL;DR: The cognitive profile findings provide a standard to which future studies can compare results from other schizophrenia samples and related disorders; the classification results point to specific areas and levels of cognitive impairment that may advance work rehabilitation efforts.