scispace - formally typeset
M

Matejka Rebolj

Researcher at King's College London

Publications -  107
Citations -  6507

Matejka Rebolj is an academic researcher from King's College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cervical cancer & Cervical screening. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 95 publications receiving 5494 citations. Previous affiliations of Matejka Rebolj include Copenhagen University Hospital & Queen Mary University of London.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Danish National Patient Register

TL;DR: Although the NPR is overall a sound data source, both the content and the definitions of single variables have changed over time and researchers using the data should carefully consider potential fallacies in the data before drawing conclusions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study

TL;DR: A consistently low six year cumulative incidence rate of CIN3+ among women negative for HPV suggests that cervical screening strategies in which women are screened for HPV every six years are safe and effective.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe

TL;DR: It is indicated that, despite substantial efforts, the recommendations of the Council of the EU on organised population-based screening for cervical cancer are not yet fulfilled and decision-makers and health service providers should consider stronger measures or incentives in order to improve cervical cancer control in Europe.
Journal ArticleDOI

The challenges of organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union.

TL;DR: Introduction of new methods of prevention, such as HPV screening and prophylactic HPV vaccination, can reduce the burden further, but this will require a high level of organisation with particular attention needed for the maximisation of population coverage.
Journal ArticleDOI

Monitoring a national cancer prevention program: successful changes in cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands.

TL;DR: The 1996 changes in protocols and guidelines, and their implementation have increased coverage and efficiency, and decreased the screening‐induced negative side effects.