scispace - formally typeset
P

Philip S. Barie

Researcher at Cornell University

Publications -  389
Citations -  14495

Philip S. Barie is an academic researcher from Cornell University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Intensive care unit & Sepsis. The author has an hindex of 63, co-authored 375 publications receiving 13428 citations. Previous affiliations of Philip S. Barie include Society of Critical Care Medicine & University of Washington.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock

TL;DR: DrotAA did not significantly reduce mortality at 28 or 90 days, as compared with placebo, in patients with septic shock, and rates of death at 28 and 90 days were not significantly different in other predefined subgroups, including patients at increased risk for death.
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for evaluation of new fever in critically ill adult patients: 2008 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

TL;DR: A task force of 11 experts in the disciplines related to critical care medicine and infectious diseases concluded that, because fever can have many infectious and noninfectious etiologies, a new fever in a patient in the intensive care unit should trigger a careful clinical assessment rather than automatic orders for laboratory and radiologic tests.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in an Era of Multidrug Resistance: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial (ASPECT-cIAI)

TL;DR: This phase 3 trial compared ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole vs meropenem for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections with high rates of presumed microbiological eradication of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Journal ArticleDOI

Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

TL;DR: This study demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for pancreatic or peripancreatic infection, mortality, or requirement for surgical intervention, and did not support early prophylactic antimicrobial use in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis.