scispace - formally typeset
R

Rajiv Narayan

Researcher at Broad Institute

Publications -  39
Citations -  6113

Rajiv Narayan is an academic researcher from Broad Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gene expression profiling & Auditory cortex. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 37 publications receiving 3885 citations. Previous affiliations of Rajiv Narayan include Boston University & Harvard University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of RNAi and CRISPR technologies by large-scale gene expression profiling in the Connectivity Map.

TL;DR: This work shows that mitigating off-target effects is feasible in these datasets via computational methodologies to produce a consensus gene signature (CGS) and compared RNAi technology to clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-based knockout by analysis of 373 single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to show that the on-target efficacies are comparable, but CRISPR technology is far less susceptible to systematic off- target effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Distinct time scales in cortical discrimination of natural sounds in songbirds.

TL;DR: The existence of distinct time scales for temporal resolution and temporal integration is demonstrated and how they arise from cortical neural responses to complex dynamic sounds is explained.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cortical Discrimination of Complex Natural Stimuli: Can Single Neurons Match Behavior?

TL;DR: This work uses the model system of songbirds to investigate whether neurons in field L, the homolog of primary auditory cortex, can match behavioral performance in the discrimination of conspecific songs, and uses a classification framework based on the (dis)similarity between single spike trains to quantify neural discrimination.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cortical interference effects in the cocktail party problem.

TL;DR: This work examines neural responses in zebra finch field L to target birdsongs that were embedded in three different maskers and identifies neural interference that could explain the perceptual interference at the heart of the cocktail party problem.