scispace - formally typeset
R

Richard N. Green

Researcher at Langley Research Center

Publications -  30
Citations -  963

Richard N. Green is an academic researcher from Langley Research Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Radiometer & Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 30 publications receiving 909 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Inversion methods for satellite studies of the Earth's Radiation Budget: Development of algorithms for the ERBE Mission

TL;DR: The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) as discussed by the authors carries a three-channel scanning radiometer and a set of nadir-looking wide and medium field-of-view instruments for measuring the radiation emitted from earth and the solar radiation reflected from earth.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determination of Unfiltered Radiances from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System Instrument

TL;DR: In this article, a new method for determining unfiltered shortwave (SW), longwave (LW) and window (W) radiances from filtered radiances measured by the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) satellite instrument is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cloud Identification for ERBE Radiative Flux Retrieval

TL;DR: In this article, a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) technique was used for cloud identification using coarse-resolution broadband satellite data using simulated satellite observations, and the results suggest that the MLE method is an improvement over a Lambertian earth assumption and the clear/cloud threshold used in the inversion of Nimbus 3 and Nimbus 7 data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Postlaunch Radiometric Validation of the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Proto-Flight Model on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Spacecraft through 1999

TL;DR: The current effort describes the radiometric performance of the CERES Proto-Flight Model on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission spacecraft over t... as discussed by the authors, which has achieved a long-term repeatability of better than 0.2% for the first 18 months of science data collection.