Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures provides requirements for general structural design and includes means for determining dead, live, soil, flood, wind, snow, rain, atmospheric ice, and earthquake loads, as well as their combinations, which are suitable for inclusion in building codes and other documents. This Standard, a revision of ASCE/SEI 7-05, offers a complete update and reorganization of the wind load provisions, expanding them from one chapter into six. The Standard contains new ultimate event wind maps with corresponding reductions in load factors, so that the loads are not affected, and updates the seismic loads with new risk-targeted seismic maps. The snow, live, and atmospheric icing provisions are updated as well. In addition, the Standard includes a detailed Commentary with explanatory and supplementary information designed to assist building code committees and regulatory authorities. Standard ASCE/SEI 7 is an integral part of building codes in the United States. Many of the load provisions are substantially adopted by reference in the International Building Code and the NFPA 5000 Building Construction and Safety Code. Structural engineers, architects, and those engaged in preparing and administering local building codes will find this Standard an essential reference in their practice. Note: New orders are fulfilled from the second printing, which incorporates the errata to the first printing.

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures

Civil infrastructure in the United States is at risk from aging, leading to structural deterioration of bridges, buildings, and other facilities from aggressive chemical attack, corrosion, and other physical mechanisms. Decisions regarding maintenance, rehabilitation and other requirements for continued utilization of a facility should be supported by quantitative evidence that aging has not caused structural strength or stiffness to deteriorate to the point where the capacity of the system to withstand or mitigate future extreme events is impaired. Current codes of practice provide little guidance for the proper evaluation of existing facilities for continued service, since their focus is on new construction. Rehabilitation investments should be aimed at maximizing the likelihood of successful future performance at minimum costs. Probabilistic risk analysis methods can provide quantitative tools for the management of uncertainty in condition assessment and are an essential ingredient of risk-informed man...

Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: state of practice and research issues

Abstract This paper presents theoretical descriptions of the key phenomena that govern the behaviour of composite framed structures in fire. These descriptions have been developed in parallel with large scale computational work undertaken as a part of a research project (The DETR-PIT Project, Behaviour of steel framed structures under fire conditions) to model the full-scale fire tests on a composite steel framed structure at Cardington (UK). Behaviour of composite structures in fire has long been understood to be dominated by the effects of strength loss caused by thermal degradation, and that large deflections and runaway resulting from the action of imposed loading on a ‘weakened’ structure. Thus ‘strength’ and ‘loads’ are quite generally believed to be the key factors determining structural response (fundamentally no different from ambient behaviour). The new understanding produced from the aforementioned project is that, composite framed structures of the type tested at Cardington possess enormous reserves of strength through adopting large displacement configurations. Furthermore, it is the thermally induced forces and displacements, and not material degradation that govern the structural response in fire. Degradation (such as steel yielding and buckling) can even be helpful in developing the large displacement load carrying modes safely. This, of course, is only true until just before failure when material degradation and loads begin to dominate the behaviour once again. However, because no clear failures of composite structures such as the Cardington frame have been seen, it is not clear how far these structures are from failure in a given fire. This paper attempts to lay down some of the most important and fundamental principles that govern the behaviour of composite frame structures in fire in a simple and comprehensible manner. This is based upon the analysis of the response of single structural elements under a combination of thermal actions and end restraints representing the surrounding structure.

Fundamental principles of structural behaviour under thermal effects (large composite buildings under compartment fires)

Community resilience has been addressed across multiple disciplines including environmental sciences, engineering, sociology, psychology, and economics. Interest in community resilience gained momentum following several key natural and human-caused hazards in the United States and worldwide. To date, a comprehensive community resilience model that encompasses the performance of all the physical and socio-economic components from immediate impact through the recovery phase of a natural disaster has not been available. This paper summarizes a literature review of previous community resilience studies with a focus on natural hazards, which includes primarily models of individual infrastructure systems, their interdependencies, and community economic and social systems. A series of national and international initiatives aimed at community resilience are also summarized in this study. This paper suggests extensions of existing modeling methodologies aimed at developing an improved, integrated understanding of resilience that can be used by policy-makers in preparation for future events.

/pdf/state-of-the-research-in-community-resilience-progress-and-4xc4amxb81.pdf

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges.

Water and wastewater network, electric power network, transportation network, communication network, and information technology network are among the critical infrastructure in our communities; their disruption during and after hazard events greatly affects communities’ well-being, economic security, social welfare, and public health. In addition, a disruption in one network may cause disruption to other networks and lead to their reduced functionality. This paper presents a unified theoretical methodology for the modeling of dependent/interdependent infrastructure networks and incorporates it in a six-step probabilistic procedure to assess their resilience. Both the methodology and the procedure are general, can be applied to any infrastructure network and hazard, and can model different types of dependencies between networks. As an illustration, the paper models the direct effects of seismic events on the functionality of a potable water distribution network and the cascading effects of the dama...

/pdf/modeling-the-resilience-of-critical-infrastructure-the-role-1tnvm0ruvz.pdf

Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: the role of network dependencies

Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers (NIST NCSTAR 1)

The development of infrastructure systems that are sustainable and resilient is a challenging task that involves a broad range of performance indicators over the system lifecycle that affect system functionality and recovery Sustainability indicators address economic, social, and environmental performance metrics and resilient indicators address strength, functionality, and recovery-time metrics following a hazard event Sustainable systems consider environmental impact and conservation of nonrenewable resources over the life of the system Resilient systems consider performance levels relative to potential damage levels and recovery times from events Both concepts address adequate system performance and lifecycle costs, but put a different emphasis on other indicators Numerous sources of uncertainties associated with the lifecycle performance of infrastructure systems require the use of a risk-informed decision-making approach to properly account for uncertainties and to identify cost-effectiv

/pdf/risk-based-decision-making-for-sustainable-and-resilient-3wn4zztz3h.pdf

Risk-Based Decision Making for Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure Systems

/pdf/developing-guidelines-and-standards-for-disaster-resilience-4pn4w7z2yf.pdf

Therese P. McAllister

Papers

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges.

Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: the role of network dependencies

Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers (NIST NCSTAR 1)

Risk-Based Decision Making for Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure Systems

Developing Guidelines and Standards for Disaster Resilience of the Built Environment: A Research Needs Assessment