Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format
Recent searches

Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format Example of Global Responsibility to Protect format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Global Responsibility to Protect — Template for authors

Publisher: Brill
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Political Science and International Relations #256 of 556 down down by 109 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 87 Published Papers | 83 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 05/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.9
SJR: 0.688
SNIP: 0.981
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 1.2
SJR: 0.25
SNIP: 1.893
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 0.7
SJR: 0.171
SNIP: 2.17
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.3
SJR: 0.538
SNIP: 1.239

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.0

25% from 2019

CiteRatio for Global Responsibility to Protect from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.0
2019 0.8
2018 0.9
2017 1.4
2016 3.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.419

63% from 2019

SJR for Global Responsibility to Protect from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.419
2019 0.257
2018 0.452
2017 0.371
2016 1.702
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.639

78% from 2019

SNIP for Global Responsibility to Protect from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.639
2019 0.358
2018 0.373
2017 0.632
2016 1.356
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 25% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 63% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 78% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Global Responsibility to Protect

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Brill

Global Responsibility to Protect

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Global Responsibility to Protect formatting guidelines as mentioned in Brill author instructions. The current version was created on 05 Jun 2020 and has been used by 557 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Political Science and International Relations

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
05 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1875-9858
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Yellow faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
plainnat
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B, 25(7):4515– 4532, 1982. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00504002
Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect
Jennifer M. Welsh1

Abstract:

Drawing on international relations theory, this article seeks to both account for and analyze the contestation that continues to surround the norm of R2P. It begins in Section I by arguing that while the 2005 Summit Outcome Document – as an example of ‘institutionalization’ – provided greater precision about the source, scope... Drawing on international relations theory, this article seeks to both account for and analyze the contestation that continues to surround the norm of R2P. It begins in Section I by arguing that while the 2005 Summit Outcome Document – as an example of ‘institutionalization’ – provided greater precision about the source, scope, and bearer of the responsibility to protect, there is continuing debate about when the international community’s remedial role in protection can and should be activated. In order to understand this reality – which is a challenge to positivist and linear accounts of normative change – we must embrace the intuitions of post-positivist constructivist scholars about the intersubjective nature of norms, and their emphasis on analyzing norms’ ‘meaning in use’. Section II demonstrates in more detail the two kinds of contestation surrounding R2P: procedural contestation concerning who (which body) should ‘own’ its development as a norm; and substantive contestation about its content. R2P is particularly susceptible to contestation, given its inherently indeterminate nature, and the erroneous tendency to measure its impact in terms of whether or not military intervention occurs in particular cases. To respond to these issues, it is argued that the norm of R2P is best conceived as a responsibility to consider a real or imminent crisis involving mass atrocity crimes - what in legal literature is sometimes called a ‘duty of conduct’. Whether or not international action actually occurs - particularly action involving military force - depends on a series of other factors. The final section addresses the challenge to constructivist scholars to be more transparent about the normative commitments that underpin their empirical studies of normative change. It argues that the contestation surrounding R2P can be better understood by giving greater attention to the normative underpinnings of contemporary critiques of the principle – most prominently those which stress the importance of sovereignty equality. read more read less

Topics:

Responsibility to protect (55%)55% related to the paper, Normative (53%)53% related to the paper, International relations theory (53%)53% related to the paper, Norm (social) (51%)51% related to the paper, Duty (51%)51% related to the paper
135 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00504006
The R2P and Norm Diffusion: Towards A Framework of Norm Circulation
Amitav Acharya1

Abstract:

The case of R2P calls for greater attention to agency and feedback in norm dynamics. New international norms are more likely to spread if the responsibility for their creation and diffusion is seen to have been more broadly shared than being credited to any particular group. Many new norms have multiple sources and contexts, ... The case of R2P calls for greater attention to agency and feedback in norm dynamics. New international norms are more likely to spread if the responsibility for their creation and diffusion is seen to have been more broadly shared than being credited to any particular group. Many new norms have multiple sources and contexts, yet there is a tendency to credit them to their final point of articulation. Moreover, once created, norms do not remain uncontested and static. The application of new norms in different locations and contexts can lead to their subsequent modifications, which in turn can reshape its initial features and support mechanisms. This feedback constitutes a form of agency, which might broaden the legitimacy and appeal of the norm and the possibility of its greater diffusion. The case of R2P shows that although it is generally attributed to the work of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, the norm had multiple prior sources, including the idea of ‘responsible sovereignty’. Furthermore, its development has had a strong African context. Lastly, subsequent controversies over the norm’s application, especially in Libya, attests to the possibility of critical feedback, such as calls for stricter enforcement of the norm’s criteria of last resort and proportionality, and greater accountability in operations conducted in defence of the norm. read more read less

Topics:

Norm (social) (56%)56% related to the paper, Responsibility to protect (50%)50% related to the paper
122 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/187598410X500462
Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics, and the War on Terror

Abstract:

David Mickler reviews Mahmood Mamdani, Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics, and the War on Terror (New York: Pantheon, 2009). ISBN 978-0-307-37723-4.

Topics:

Human rights (55%)55% related to the paper, Responsibility to protect (53%)53% related to the paper, Politics (50%)50% related to the paper
107 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/187598409X405460
R2P: From Idea to Norm—and Action?
Ramesh Thakur, Thomas G. Weiss1

Abstract:

The most dramatic normative development of our time—comparable to the Nuremberg trials and the 1948 Convention on Genocide in the immediate aftermath of World War II—relates to the 'responsibility to protect', the title of the 2001 report from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. It no longer is... The most dramatic normative development of our time—comparable to the Nuremberg trials and the 1948 Convention on Genocide in the immediate aftermath of World War II—relates to the 'responsibility to protect', the title of the 2001 report from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. It no longer is necessary to finesse the tensions between sovereignty and human rights in the UN Charter; they can now be confronted because sovereignty no longer implies the license to kill. This essay outlines the origins of the R2P idea, describes the background factors in the 1990s that paved the way for the advancement of this norm by norm entrepreneurs, champions, and brokers. It continues with an account of the process by which the ICISS arrived at its landmark report, a description of the sustained engagement with the R2P agenda from 2001, when the ICISS report was published, to its adoption at the 2005 World Summit. The essay concludes with a sketch of the tasks and challenges that lie ahead to move R2P from a norm to a template for policy and action. read more read less

Topics:

Responsibility to protect (58%)58% related to the paper, Sovereignty (57%)57% related to the paper, Humanitarian intervention (55%)55% related to the paper, Genocide (54%)54% related to the paper, Human rights (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
88 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1163/187598409X405451
Sovereignty, Choice, and the Responsibility to Protect

Abstract:

It is commonly asserted that the chief obstacle to advancing acceptance of the responsibility to protect (RtoP) is the reluctance of developing countries to compromise their sovereignty. This paper argues, instead, that both developing and some of the more powerful developed countries have concerns about the implications of R... It is commonly asserted that the chief obstacle to advancing acceptance of the responsibility to protect (RtoP) is the reluctance of developing countries to compromise their sovereignty. This paper argues, instead, that both developing and some of the more powerful developed countries have concerns about the implications of RtoP for their sovereignty. The former are more likely to be concerned about territorial sovereignty and the latter about decision-making sovereignty. Both sets of concerns were openly expressed during the debates leading up to the consensus at the 2005 World Summit on RtoP. That consensus was facilitated by the fact that the wording of the relevant provisions of its Outcome Document took both types of reservations about sovereignty into account. The paper argues that the recognition that countries of the North and the South tend to be more united than divided by their determination to preserve their sovereignty should facilitate efforts to achieve consensus on how to operationalise and implement the responsibility to protect. read more read less

Topics:

Responsibility to protect (62%)62% related to the paper, Sovereignty (62%)62% related to the paper, Popular sovereignty (57%)57% related to the paper, International law (50%)50% related to the paper, United Nations Charter (50%)50% related to the paper
55 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Global Responsibility to Protect.

It automatically formats your research paper to Brill formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Global Responsibility to Protect format uses plainnat citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Global Responsibility to Protect in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Global Responsibility to Protect guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Global Responsibility to Protect guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Global Responsibility to Protect guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Global Responsibility to Protect?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Global Responsibility to Protect citation style.

4. Can I use the Global Responsibility to Protect templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Global Responsibility to Protect.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Global Responsibility to Protect that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Global Responsibility to Protect that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Global Responsibility to Protect?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Global Responsibility to Protect.

7. Where can I find the template for the Global Responsibility to Protect?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Global Responsibility to Protect's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Global Responsibility to Protect's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Global Responsibility to Protect an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Global Responsibility to Protect is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Global Responsibility to Protect?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Global Responsibility to Protect?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Global Responsibility to Protect?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Global Responsibility to Protect, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Global Responsibility to Protect's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Global Responsibility to Protect?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Global Responsibility to Protect. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Global Responsibility to Protect?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Global Responsibility to Protect are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Global Responsibility to Protect?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Global Responsibility to Protect's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Global Responsibility to Protect in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Global Responsibility to Protect Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Global Responsibility to Protect formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template