scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Arkansas Department of Education

GovernmentLittle Rock, Arkansas, United States
About: Arkansas Department of Education is a government organization based out in Little Rock, Arkansas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: School choice & Voucher. The organization has 37 authors who have published 112 publications receiving 1325 citations. The organization is also known as: ADE.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a review examines the existing evidence on the impacts of Promise Programs on community development, K-12 academic achievement, and student post-secondary outcomes, concluding that Promise Programs are successful at improving housing prices, attracting residents to Promise zones, improving student K- 12 academic outcomes, and increasing postsecondary enrollment.
Abstract: This review examines the existing evidence on the impacts of Promise Programs on community development, K-12 academic achievement, and student postsecondary outcomes. Promise Programs are place-based, guaranteed college scholarships offered to all students who graduate from a certain school or district while meeting the minimum thresholds of the program. We delineate Promise Programs by their design - whether the scholarships are available to all students, are awarded based on merit, or are awarded based on need. We also note the applicability of Promise Programs - whether the funds be used at a wide range of postsecondary institutions, or if they are narrowly targeted towards certain institutions. We find suggestive evidence that Promise Programs are successful at improving housing prices, attracting residents to Promise zones, improving student K-12 academic outcomes, and increasing postsecondary enrollment. However, the number of studies examining Promise Programs remains limited, and skewed towards particular programs.

18 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors found that the vast majority of both Islamic and reactionary terrorists attended traditional public schools and had no religious education; hence findings suggest that early religious training and identification may actually encourage prosocial behavior.
Abstract: Some commentators argue that private religious schools are less likely to inculcate the attributes of good citizenship than traditional public schools, specifically proposing that private Islamic schools are relatively more likely to produce individuals sympathetic to terrorism. This study offers a preliminary examination of the question by studying the educational backgrounds of Western educated terrorists. While data are limited, in accord with prior work findings indicate the vast majority of both Islamic and reactionary terrorists attended traditional public schools and had no religious education; hence findings suggest that early religious training and identification may actually encourage prosocial behavior.

18 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors employ probit regression analysis to compare the adult voting activity of students who participated in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP) to their matched public school counterparts and find evidence that private school voucher students are more or less likely to vote in 2012 or 2016 than students educated in public schools.
Abstract: We employ probit regression analysis to compare the adult voting activity of students who participated in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (MPCP) to their matched public school counterparts. We use a sophisticated matching algorithm to create a traditional public school student comparison group using data from the state-mandated evaluation of the MPCP. By the time the students are 19-26 years old, we do not find evidence that private school voucher students are more or less likely to vote in 2012 or 2016 than students educated in public schools. These results are robust to all models and are consistent for all subgroups.

18 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The causal estimates show that retirement leads to fewer doctor visits in both the US and continental Europe, and increasing the statutory retirement age to help the solvency of the retirement systems will increase doctor visits as individuals continue to work longer.
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to estimate the causal effect of retirement on health care utilization. To do so, we use data from the 1992-2008 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the 2004-2006 waves of the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). In particular, we estimate the causal impact of retirement on health care utilization as measured by: doctor visits, visits to a general practitioner, nights in the hospital, and preventative care use. This paper uses panel data and instrumental variable methods, exploiting variation in statutory retirement ages across countries, to estimate the causal effects. Cross-country comparisons allow us to examine the role of a health care system’s use of the general practitioner as a gate keeper to specialists in this relationship. We find that while retirement is associated with increased health care use, our causal estimates show that retirement leads to fewer doctor visits in both the US and continental Europe. Nights in the hospital are unaffected by retirement status. Further we find that health care systems with primary care physicians who act as gatekeepers are particularly effective at decreasing doctor visits at retirement. Therefore, we conclude that increasing the statutory retirement age to help the solvency of the retirement systems will also increase doctor visits as individuals continue to work longer. In the US, the burden of this increased utilization will likely be borne by private insurance companies and public insurance to the extent it covers working individuals in their 60’s. European evidence suggests that this increase in doctor visits due to delayed retirement will be particularly evident in health systems without strong gatekeeper roles for general practitioners.

18 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper found that survey effort measures of character skills, in particular measures of careless answering in surveys, show great promise for being good proxy measures of relevant non-cognitive skills, such as conscientiousness, grit, self-control, and a growth mindset.
Abstract: Though researchers now are aware of the potential importance of character skills, such as conscientiousness, grit, self-control, and a growth mindset, researchers struggle to find reliable measures of these skills. In this paper, we use data collected from the Understanding America Study, a nationally representative internet panel to study the validity of innovative measures of character skills based on measures of survey effort. We believe surveys themselves can be seen as a behavioral tasks and that respondents provide meaningful information about their character skills by way of the effort they put forward on surveys. In particular, we compare measures of grit, conscientiousness and other personality traits, and growth mindset, based on self-reports, and survey effort measures of character. We study the relationship across each other and their relationship with academic and life outcomes such as income and labor-market outcomes, after controlling for cognitive ability and other relevant demographic characteristics. Our results show that survey effort measures of character skills, in particular measures of careless answering in surveys, show great promise for being good proxy measures of relevant non-cognitive skills.

17 citations


Authors

Showing all 37 results

Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Federal Reserve System
10.3K papers, 511.9K citations

75% related

Economic Policy Institute
14.2K papers, 765.8K citations

72% related

World Bank
21.5K papers, 1.1M citations

71% related

London School of Economics and Political Science
35K papers, 1.4M citations

71% related

London Business School
5.1K papers, 437.9K citations

70% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20204
201916
20185
201719
201622
201517