Institution
Capital District Health Authority
Government•Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada•
About: Capital District Health Authority is a government organization based out in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 929 authors who have published 933 publications receiving 31844 citations.
Topics: Population, Health care, Public health, Mental health, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Emory University1, University of Pittsburgh2, Riverside Methodist Hospital3, University of Miami4, Autonomous University of Barcelona5, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse6, Baptist Health7, Case Western Reserve University8, University at Buffalo9, Royal Melbourne Hospital10, Rush University Medical Center11, California Pacific Medical Center12, University Health Network13, University Of Tennessee System14, University of Kansas15, University of Barcelona16, Capital District Health Authority17, Kaiser Permanente18, University of California, Los Angeles19, University of California, San Francisco20
TL;DR: Among patients with acute stroke who had last been known to be well 6 to 24 hours earlier and who had a mismatch between clinical deficit and infarct, outcomes for disability at 90 days were better with thrombectomy plus standard care than with standard care alone.
Abstract: BackgroundThe effect of endovascular thrombectomy that is performed more than 6 hours after the onset of ischemic stroke is uncertain. Patients with a clinical deficit that is disproportionately severe relative to the infarct volume may benefit from late thrombectomy. MethodsWe enrolled patients with occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery who had last been known to be well 6 to 24 hours earlier and who had a mismatch between the severity of the clinical deficit and the infarct volume, with mismatch criteria defined according to age (<80 years or ≥80 years). Patients were randomly assigned to thrombectomy plus standard care (the thrombectomy group) or to standard care alone (the control group). The coprimary end points were the mean score for disability on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale (which ranges from 0 [death] to 10 [no symptoms or disability]) and the rate of functional independence (a score of 0, 1, or 2 on the modified Rankin scale, whic...
3,331 citations
••
TL;DR: A systematic process for creating a frailty index, which relates deficit accumulation to the individual risk of death, showed reproducible properties in the Yale Precipitating Events Project cohort study.
Abstract: Background
Frailty can be measured in relation to the accumulation of deficits using a frailty index. A frailty index can be developed from most ageing databases. Our objective is to systematically describe a standard procedure for constructing a frailty index.
2,149 citations
••
TL;DR: The phenotypic definition of frailty, which offers ready clinical operationalization, discriminates broad levels of risk but requires additional clinical translation, but allows the risk of adverse outcomes to be defined more precisely.
Abstract: Background. Many definitions of frailty exist, but few have been directly compared. We compared the relationship between a definition of frailty based on a specific phenotype with one based on an index of deficit accumulation. Methods. The data come from all 2305 people 70 years old and older who composed the clinical examination cohort of the second wave of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. We tested convergent validity by correlating the measures with each other and with other health status measures, and analyzed cumulative index distributions in relation to phenotype. To test criterion validity, we evaluated survival (institutionalization and all-cause mortality) by frailty index (FI) score, stratified by the phenotypic definitions as ‘‘robust,’’ ‘‘pre-frail,’’ and ‘‘frail.’’ Results. The measures correlated moderately well with each other (R ¼ 0.65) and with measures of function (phenotypic definition R ¼0.66; FI R ¼0.73) but less well with cognition (phenotypic definition R ¼� 0.35; FI R ¼� 0.58). The median FI scores increased from 0.12 for the robust to 0.30 for the pre-frail and 0.44 for the frail. Survival was also lower with increasing frailty, and institutionalization was more common, but within each phenotypic class, there were marked differences in outcomes based on the FI values—e.g., among robust people, the median 5-year survival for those with lower FI values was 85%, compared with 55% for those with higher FI values. Conclusion. The phenotypic definition of frailty, which offers ready clinical operationalization, discriminates broad levels of risk. The FI requires additional clinical translation, but allows the risk of adverse outcomes to be defined more precisely.
1,007 citations
••
TL;DR: An extensive literature review was conducted to determine whether the current psychopharmacological treatment recommendations required revision and whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant new treatment recommendations for prespecified outcomes of interest.
Abstract: In light of the large number of studies published since the 2004 update of Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team psychopharmacological treatment recommendations, we conducted an extensive literature review to determine whether the current psychopharmacological treatment recommendations required revision and whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant new treatment recommendations for prespecified outcomes of interest. We reviewed over 400 articles, which resulted in 16 treatment recommendations: the revision of 11 previous treatment recommendations and 5 new treatment recommendations. Three previous treatment recommendations were eliminated. There were 13 interventions and/or outcomes for which there was insufficient evidence for a treatment recommendation, and a statement was written to summarize the current level of evidence and identify important gaps in our knowledge that need to be addressed. In general, there was considerable consensus among the Psychopharmacology Evidence Review Group and the expert consultants. Two major areas of contention concerned whether there was sufficient evidence to recommend specific dosage ranges for the acute and maintenance treatment of first-episode and multi-episode schizophrenia and to endorse the practice of switching antipsychotics for the treatment of antipsychotic-related weight gain. Finally, there continue to be major gaps in our knowledge, including limited information on (1) the use of adjunctive pharmacological agents for the treatment of persistent positive symptoms or other symptom domains of psychopathology, including anxiety, cognitive impairments, depressive symptoms, and persistent negative symptoms and (2) the treatment of co-occurring substance or medical disorders that occur frequently in individuals with schizophrenia.
806 citations
••
735 citations
Authors
Showing all 930 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Kenneth Rockwood | 108 | 739 | 61785 |
Patrick J. McGrath | 107 | 681 | 51940 |
James M. Gold | 96 | 383 | 32208 |
Brian H. Rowe | 91 | 618 | 31205 |
Alan S. Bellack | 75 | 225 | 18999 |
Martin Alda | 69 | 362 | 21408 |
Norman M. Kneteman | 62 | 305 | 21503 |
Faith Dickerson | 62 | 225 | 13336 |
Jonathan R. T. Lakey | 61 | 310 | 20257 |
Arnold Mitnitski | 60 | 157 | 20747 |
Lisa B. Dixon | 56 | 324 | 14703 |
John D. Fisk | 55 | 204 | 12621 |
Clark R. Wilson | 53 | 182 | 7770 |
Balwantray C. Chauhan | 53 | 200 | 9094 |
Robert Axelrod | 51 | 116 | 51009 |