Institution
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Healthcare•Englewood, New Jersey, United States•
About: Englewood Hospital and Medical Center is a healthcare organization based out in Englewood, New Jersey, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Anemia & Blood transfusion. The organization has 354 authors who have published 532 publications receiving 16381 citations. The organization is also known as: Engelwood Hospital.
Topics: Anemia, Blood transfusion, Blood management, Population, Health care
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Kentucky1, Dartmouth College2, Washington University in St. Louis3, Wake Forest University4, Anschutz Medical Campus5, Oregon Health & Science University6, Society of Thoracic Surgeons7, Yeshiva University8, Stanford University9, University of Toronto10, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center11, Duke University12, University of Pittsburgh13, Flinders University14, Harvard University15
TL;DR: Much has changed since the previously published 2007 STS blood management guidelines and this document contains new and revised recommendations.
1,090 citations
••
Rutgers University1, Washington University in St. Louis2, University of British Columbia3, University of Ottawa4, University of Alabama at Birmingham5, University of Vermont6, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston7, Food and Drug Administration8, Yale University9, Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center10, Duke University11, Emory University12, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center13, University of Massachusetts Medical School14, University of South Florida15
TL;DR: The AABB developed this guideline to provide clinical recommendations about hemoglobin concentration thresholds and other clinical variables that trigger RBC transfusions in hemodynamically stable adults and children.
Abstract: Description: Although approximately 85 million units of red blood cells (RBCs) are transfused annually worldwide, transfusion practices vary widely The AABB (formerly, the American Association of Blood Banks) developed this guideline to provide clinical recommendations about hemoglobin concentration thresholds and other clinical variables that trigger RBC transfusions in hemodynamically stable adults and children Methods: These guidelines are based on a systematic review of randomized clinical trials evaluating transfusion thresholds We performed a literature search from 1950 to February 2011 with no language restrictions We examined the proportion of patients who received any RBC transfusion and the number of RBC units transfused to describe the effect of restrictive transfusion strategies on RBC use To determine the clinical consequences of restrictive transfusion strategies, we examined overall mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac events, pulmonary edema, stroke, thromboembolism, renal failure, infection, hemorrhage, mental confusion, functional recovery, and length of hospital stay Recommendation 1: The AABB recommends adhering to a restrictive transfusion strategy (7 to 8 g/dL) in hospitalized, stable patients (Grade: strong recommendation; high-quality evidence) Recommendation 2: The AABB suggests adhering to a restrictive strategy in hospitalized patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and considering transfusion for patients with symptoms or a hemoglobin level of 8 g/dL or less (Grade: weak recommendation; moderate-quality evidence) Recommendation 3: The AABB cannot recommend for or against a liberal or restrictive transfusion threshold for hospitalized, hemodynamically stable patients with the acute coronary syndrome (Grade: uncertain recommendation; very low-quality evidence) Recommendation 4: The AABB suggests that transfusion decisions be influenced by symptoms as well as hemoglobin concentration (Grade: weak recommendation; low-quality evidence)
994 citations
••
Rutgers University1, McMaster University2, Washington University in St. Louis3, University of Minnesota4, University of Vermont Medical Center5, University of Washington6, University of Texas at Austin7, University of Pennsylvania8, University of Iowa9, Northwestern University10, Duke University11, Emory University12, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center13, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine14
TL;DR: A restrictive RBC transfusion threshold is safe in most clinical settings and the current blood banking practices of using standard-issue blood should be continued.
Abstract: Importance More than 100 million units of blood are collected worldwide each year, yet the indication for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and the optimal length of RBC storage prior to transfusion are uncertain. Objective To provide recommendations for the target hemoglobin level for RBC transfusion among hospitalized adult patients who are hemodynamically stable and the length of time RBCs should be stored prior to transfusion. Evidence Review Reference librarians conducted a literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating hemoglobin thresholds for RBC transfusion (1950-May 2016) and RBC storage duration (1948-May 2016) without language restrictions. The results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. For RBC transfusion thresholds, 31 RCTs included 12 587 participants and compared restrictive thresholds (transfusion not indicated until the hemoglobin level is 7-8 g/dL) with liberal thresholds (transfusion not indicated until the hemoglobin level is 9-10 g/dL). The summary estimates across trials demonstrated that restrictive RBC transfusion thresholds were not associated with higher rates of adverse clinical outcomes, including 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, rebleeding, pneumonia, or thromboembolism. For RBC storage duration, 13 RCTs included 5515 participants randomly allocated to receive fresher blood or standard-issue blood. These RCTs demonstrated that fresher blood did not improve clinical outcomes. Findings It is good practice to consider the hemoglobin level, the overall clinical context, patient preferences, and alternative therapies when making transfusion decisions regarding an individual patient. Recommendation 1: a restrictive RBC transfusion threshold in which the transfusion is not indicated until the hemoglobin level is 7 g/dL is recommended for hospitalized adult patients who are hemodynamically stable, including critically ill patients, rather than when the hemoglobin level is 10 g/dL (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). A restrictive RBC transfusion threshold of 8 g/dL is recommended for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, cardiac surgery, and those with preexisting cardiovascular disease (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). The restrictive transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL is likely comparable with 8 g/dL, but RCT evidence is not available for all patient categories. These recommendations do not apply to patients with acute coronary syndrome, severe thrombocytopenia (patients treated for hematological or oncological reasons who are at risk of bleeding), and chronic transfusion–dependent anemia (not recommended due to insufficient evidence). Recommendation 2: patients, including neonates, should receive RBC units selected at any point within their licensed dating period (standard issue) rather than limiting patients to transfusion of only fresh (storage length: Conclusions and Relevance Research in RBC transfusion medicine has significantly advanced the science in recent years and provides high-quality evidence to inform guidelines. A restrictive transfusion threshold is safe in most clinical settings and the current blood banking practices of using standard-issue blood should be continued.
812 citations
••
Harvard University1, University of South Florida2, University of Washington3, University of British Columbia4, University of Ottawa5, Boston Children's Hospital6, Christiana Care Health System7, University of Minnesota8, University of Vermont9, Washington University in St. Louis10, Food and Drug Administration11, Wayne State University12, University of Pennsylvania13, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center14, Yale University15, Canadian Blood Services16, University of Massachusetts Medical School17, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center18, Johns Hopkins University19, Children's National Medical Center20
TL;DR: These guidelines were designed to provide pragmatic recommendations, based on the best available published evidence, about when platelet transfusion may be appropriate in adult patients, and provide advice for adult patients who are candidates for platelets transfusion.
Abstract: Platelet transfusions are administered to prevent or treat bleeding in patients with quantitative or qualitative platelet disorders The AABB (formerly, the American Association of Blood Banks) dev
684 citations
••
TL;DR: Determining the cost of supplying patients with blood transfusions requires an in‐depth examination of the complex array of activities surrounding the decision to transfuse.
653 citations
Authors
Showing all 358 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Frank J. Veith | 62 | 334 | 12078 |
Aryeh Shander | 51 | 247 | 12066 |
Alan Dardik | 49 | 389 | 9625 |
Peter N. Benotti | 48 | 147 | 7861 |
Robert E. Baier | 41 | 184 | 6018 |
Lawrence R. Krakoff | 38 | 199 | 7402 |
Hector P. Rodriguez | 36 | 180 | 5048 |
G. Craig Wood | 36 | 127 | 4491 |
Herbert Dardik | 34 | 144 | 3058 |
M. Arisan Ergin | 29 | 57 | 5088 |
Ibrahim M. Ibrahim | 26 | 67 | 1849 |
Parasuram Krishnamoorthy | 20 | 66 | 1732 |
Mazyar Javidroozi | 18 | 50 | 1597 |
Irving Dardik | 18 | 31 | 978 |
Barry Sussman | 16 | 28 | 919 |