scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Microsoft

CompanyRedmond, Washington, United States
About: Microsoft is a company organization based out in Redmond, Washington, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: User interface & Context (language use). The organization has 49501 authors who have published 86900 publications receiving 4195429 citations. The organization is also known as: MS & MSFT.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
10 Sep 2000
TL;DR: A novel image indexing technique that may be called an image hash function, which uses randomized signal processing strategies for a non-reversible compression of images into random binary strings, and is shown to be robust against image changes due to compression, geometric distortions, and other attacks.
Abstract: The proliferation of digital images creates problems for managing large image databases, indexing individual images, and protecting intellectual property. This paper introduces a novel image indexing technique that may be called an image hash function. The algorithm uses randomized signal processing strategies for a non-reversible compression of images into random binary strings, and is shown to be robust against image changes due to compression, geometric distortions, and other attacks. This algorithm brings to images a direct analog of message authentication codes (MACs) from cryptography, in which a main goal is to make hash values on a set of distinct inputs pairwise independent. This minimizes the probability that two hash values collide, even, when inputs are generated by an adversary.

585 citations

Book ChapterDOI
20 Aug 2009
TL;DR: This paper motivates VCC, describes the verification methodology, the architecture of VCC is described, and the experience using VCC to verify the Microsoft Hyper-V hypervisor is reported on.
Abstract: VCC is an industrial-strength verification environment for low-level concurrent system code written in C. VCC takes a program (annotated with function contracts, state assertions, and type invariants) and attempts to prove the correctness of these annotations. It includes tools for monitoring proof attempts and constructing partial counterexample executions for failed proofs. This paper motivates VCC, describes our verification methodology, describes the architecture of VCC, and reports on our experience using VCC to verify the Microsoft Hyper-V hypervisor.

584 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: PixelDefend as mentioned in this paper purifies a maliciously perturbed image by moving it back towards the distribution seen in the training data, and runs the purified image through an unmodified classifier, making the method agnostic to both the classifier and the attacking method.
Abstract: Adversarial perturbations of normal images are usually imperceptible to humans, but they can seriously confuse state-of-the-art machine learning models. What makes them so special in the eyes of image classifiers? In this paper, we show empirically that adversarial examples mainly lie in the low probability regions of the training distribution, regardless of attack types and targeted models. Using statistical hypothesis testing, we find that modern neural density models are surprisingly good at detecting imperceptible image perturbations. Based on this discovery, we devised PixelDefend, a new approach that purifies a maliciously perturbed image by moving it back towards the distribution seen in the training data. The purified image is then run through an unmodified classifier, making our method agnostic to both the classifier and the attacking method. As a result, PixelDefend can be used to protect already deployed models and be combined with other model-specific defenses. Experiments show that our method greatly improves resilience across a wide variety of state-of-the-art attacking methods, increasing accuracy on the strongest attack from 63% to 84% for Fashion MNIST and from 32% to 70% for CIFAR-10.

584 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
Onur Mutlu1, Thomas Moscibroda1
01 Dec 2007
TL;DR: This paper proposes a new memory access scheduler, called the Stall-Time Fair Memory scheduler (STFM), that provides quality of service to different threads sharing the DRAM memory system and shows that STFM significantly reduces the unfairness in theDRAM system while also improving system throughput on a wide variety of workloads and systems.
Abstract: DRAM memory is a major resource shared among cores in a chip multiprocessor (CMP) system. Memory requests from different threads can interfere with each other. Existing memory access scheduling techniques try to optimize the overall data throughput obtained from the DRAM and thus do not take into account inter-thread interference. Therefore, different threads running together on the same chip can ex- perience extremely different memory system performance: one thread can experience a severe slowdown or starvation while another is un- fairly prioritized by the memory scheduler. This paper proposes a new memory access scheduler, called the Stall-Time Fair Memory scheduler (STFM), that provides quality of service to different threads sharing the DRAM memory system. The goal of the proposed scheduler is to "equalize" the DRAM-related slowdown experienced by each thread due to interference from other threads, without hurting overall system performance. As such, STFM takes into account inherent memory characteristics of each thread and does not unfairly penalize threads that use the DRAM system without interfering with other threads. We show that STFM significantly reduces the unfairness in the DRAM system while also improving system throughput (i.e., weighted speedup of threads) on a wide variety of workloads and systems. For example, averaged over 32 different workloads running on an 8-core CMP, the ratio between the highest DRAM-related slowdown and the lowest DRAM-related slowdown reduces from 5.26X to 1.4X, while the average system throughput improves by 7.6%. We qualitatively and quantitatively compare STFM to one new and three previously- proposed memory access scheduling algorithms, including network fair queueing. Our results show that STFM provides the best fairness, system throughput, and scalability.

584 citations

Posted Content
Jifeng Dai1, Kaiming He1, Jian Sun1
TL;DR: In this article, a method called BoxSup is proposed to generate region proposals and then train a convolutional network with bounding box annotations to achieve state-of-the-art results on semantic segmentation.
Abstract: Recent leading approaches to semantic segmentation rely on deep convolutional networks trained with human-annotated, pixel-level segmentation masks. Such pixel-accurate supervision demands expensive labeling effort and limits the performance of deep networks that usually benefit from more training data. In this paper, we propose a method that achieves competitive accuracy but only requires easily obtained bounding box annotations. The basic idea is to iterate between automatically generating region proposals and training convolutional networks. These two steps gradually recover segmentation masks for improving the networks, and vise versa. Our method, called BoxSup, produces competitive results supervised by boxes only, on par with strong baselines fully supervised by masks under the same setting. By leveraging a large amount of bounding boxes, BoxSup further unleashes the power of deep convolutional networks and yields state-of-the-art results on PASCAL VOC 2012 and PASCAL-CONTEXT.

582 citations


Authors

Showing all 49603 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
P. Chang1702154151783
Andrew Zisserman167808261717
Alexander S. Szalay166936145745
Darien Wood1602174136596
Xiang Zhang1541733117576
Vivek Sharma1503030136228
Rajesh Kumar1494439140830
Bernhard Schölkopf1481092149492
Thomas S. Huang1461299101564
Christopher D. Manning138499147595
Nicolas Berger137158196529
Georgios B. Giannakis137132173517
Luc Van Gool1331307107743
Eric Horvitz13391466162
Xiaoou Tang13255394555
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Google
39.8K papers, 2.1M citations

98% related

Facebook
10.9K papers, 570.1K citations

96% related

AT&T Labs
5.5K papers, 483.1K citations

94% related

Carnegie Mellon University
104.3K papers, 5.9M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202312
2022168
20213,509
20204,696
20194,319
20184,135