scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Oregon Health & Science University

EducationPortland, Oregon, United States
About: Oregon Health & Science University is a education organization based out in Portland, Oregon, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 30245 authors who have published 65190 publications receiving 3302774 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Oregon Health Sciences Center & Oregon Health Sciences University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper discusses sources of information, the statistical properties of utilization data, common analytic methods including the two-part model, and some newly available statistical methodsincluding the generalized linear model.
Abstract: Important questions about health care are often addressed by studying health care utilization. Utilization data have several characteristics that make them a challenge to analyze. In this paper we discuss sources of information, the statistical properties of utilization data, common analytic methods including the two-part model, and some newly available statistical methods including the generalized linear model. We also address issues of study design and new methods for dealing with censored data. Examples are presented.

652 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this large cohort of AF patients given aspirin, those with intermittent AF had stroke rates similar to patients with sustained AF and similar stroke risk factors.

651 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The development, growth, and survival of eukaryotic organisms require the proper regulation of tens of thousands of genes, and one of these regulatory components is the RNA polymerase II core promoter.
Abstract: The development, growth, and survival of eukaryotic organisms require the proper regulation of tens of thousands of genes. By complex formulae that have yet to be solved, the expression of each of these thousands of genes is controlled by a wide variety of mechanisms (e.g., see Lefstin and Yamamoto 1998; Roeder 1998; Struhl 1999; Glass and Rosenfeld 2000; Lee and Young 2000; Lemon and Tjian 2000; Strahl and Allis 2000; Courey and Jia 2001; Smale 2001; White 2001; Zhang and Reinberg 2001; Emerson 2002; McKenna and O’Malley 2002; Narlikar et al. 2002; Orphanides and Reinberg 2002; West et al. 2002). In this review, we will focus on one of these regulatory components—the RNA polymerase II core promoter.

651 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The technique effectively separates the moving and static scattering elements within tissue to achieve high resolution images of blood flow, mapped into the 3-D optically sectioned tissue beds, at speeds that allow for perfusion assessment in vivo.
Abstract: With existing optical imaging techniques three-dimensional (3-D) mapping of microvascular perfusion within tissue beds is severely limited by the efficient scattering and absorption of light by tissue. To overcome these limitations we have developed a method of optical angiography (OAG) that can generate 3-D angiograms within millimeter tissue depths by analyzing the endogenous optical scattering signal from an illuminated sample. The technique effectively separates the moving and static scattering elements within tissue to achieve high resolution images of blood flow, mapped into the 3-D optically sectioned tissue beds, at speeds that allow for perfusion assessment in vivo. Its development has its origin in Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. We used OAG to visualize the cerebral microcirculation, of adult living mice through the intact cranium, measurements which would be difficult, if not impossible, with other optical imaging techniques.

650 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This meta-analysis of the literature reveals that imaging findings of spine degeneration are present in high proportions of asymptomatic individuals, increasing with age, and must be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical condition.
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Degenerative changes are commonly found in spine imaging but often occur in pain-free individuals as well as those with back pain. We sought to estimate the prevalence, by age, of common degenerative spine conditions by performing a systematic review studying the prevalence of spine degeneration on imaging in asymptomatic individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles reporting the prevalence of imaging findings (CT or MR imaging) in asymptomatic individuals from published English literature through April 2014. Two reviewers evaluated each manuscript. We selected age groupings by decade (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 years), determining age-specific prevalence estimates. For each imaging finding, we fit a generalized linear mixed-effects model for the age-specific prevalence estimate clustering in the study, adjusting for the midpoint of the reported age interval. RESULTS: Thirty-three articles reporting imaging findings for 3110 asymptomatic individuals met our study inclusion criteria. The prevalence of disk degeneration in asymptomatic individuals increased from 37% of 20-year-old individuals to 96% of 80-year-old individuals. Disk bulge prevalence increased from 30% of those 20 years of age to 84% of those 80 years of age. Disk protrusion prevalence increased from 29% of those 20 years of age to 43% of those 80 years of age. The prevalence of annular fissure increased from 19% of those 20 years of age to 29% of those 80 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging findings of spine degeneration are present in high proportions of asymptomatic individuals, increasing with age. Many imaging-based degenerative features are likely part of normal aging and unassociated with pain. These imaging findings must be interpreted in the context of the patient’s clinical condition.

649 citations


Authors

Showing all 30591 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Gordon B. Mills1871273186451
David W. Bates1591239116698
David Eisenberg156697112460
Christopher K. Glass154427108997
Xiang Zhang1541733117576
Howard I. Scher151944101737
David J.P. Barker14844699373
Steven L. Salzberg147407231756
Richard A. Deyo13948386769
Christopher D.M. Fletcher13867482484
Richard J. Johnson13788072201
Jay Shendure13546676953
John D. Scott13562583878
Douglas C. Wallace13447572035
Joel N. Hirschhorn133431101061
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

98% related

Brigham and Women's Hospital
110.5K papers, 6.8M citations

97% related

University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

97% related

National Institutes of Health
297.8K papers, 21.3M citations

96% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023103
2022364
20214,420
20204,013
20193,612
20183,292