scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

67A Designed extension of studies based on conditional power

Michael A. Proschan, +1 more
- 01 Jun 1995 - 
- Vol. 16, Iss: 3
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A flexible method of extending a study based on conditional power, where the significance of the treatment difference at the planned end is used to determine the number of additional observations needed and the critical value necessary after accruing those additional observations.
About
This article is published in Controlled Clinical Trials.The article was published on 1995-06-01. It has received 252 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Extension (predicate logic).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Testing multiple primary endpoints in clinical trials with sample size adaptation.

TL;DR: It is shown that using alpha exhaustive designs greatly improve the power when both endpoints are effective, and the power difference between the two adaptation rules is minimal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving the statistical power of economic experiments using adaptive designs

TL;DR: In this article , the authors provide a concise overview of the relevant theory and illustrate the method in three different applications, including a simulation study of a hypothetical experimental design, as well as illustrations using two data sets from previous experiments.
Posted Content

Conditional Power and Friends: The Why and How of (Un)planned, Unblinded Sample Size Recalculations in Confirmatory Trials

TL;DR: It is shown that commonly discussed sample size recalculation rules lead to paradoxical adaptations where an initially planned optimal design is not invariant under the adaptation rule even if the planning assumptions do not change, and two alternatives are proposed to avoid such inconsistencies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Utility of Adaptive Sample Size Designs and A Review Example

TL;DR: Kohei Uemura Shin-kasumigaseki Bldg. 3-3-2, Kasumicaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0013, Japan Phone : +81-3.3506-9487, Facsimile: +81 -3-350 6-9567, E-mail: uemura-kohei@pmda.go.jp

Adaptive, Group Sequential Designs that Balance the Benefits and Risks of Wider Inclusion Criteria

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a new class of adaptive randomized trial designs aimed at gaining the advantages of wider generalizability and faster recruitment, while mitigating the risks of including a population for which there is greater a priori uncertainty.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Modification of Sample Size in Group Sequential Clinical Trials

TL;DR: A new group sequential test procedure is developed by modifying the weights used in the traditional repeated significance two-sample mean test, which has the type I error probability preserved at the target level and can provide a substantial gain in power with the increase of sample size.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive design methods in clinical trials – a review

TL;DR: Several commonly considered adaptive designs in clinical trials are reviewed and some examples concerning the development of Velcade intended for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma are given.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive Designs in Clinical Drug Development—An Executive Summary of the PhRMA Working Group

TL;DR: Three particular areas where it is felt that adaptive designs can be utilized beneficially are discussed: dose finding, seamless Phase II/III trials designs, and sample size reestimation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples.

TL;DR: The benefits and limitations of adaptive sample size re-estimation for phase 3 confirmatory clinical trials are discussed and those promising circumstances in which a conventional final inference can be performed while preserving the overall type-1 error are defined.