scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of domain analysis solutions for product lines

Mahvish Khurum, +1 more
- 01 Dec 2009 - 
- Vol. 82, Iss: 12, pp 1982-2003
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The finding of this review indicates that, although many new domain analysis solutions for software product lines have been proposed over the years, the absence of qualitative and quantitative results from empirical application and/or validation makes it hard to evaluate the potential of proposed solutions with respect to their usability and/ or usefulness for industry adoption.
About
This article is published in Journal of Systems and Software.The article was published on 2009-12-01. It has received 76 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Domain engineering & Feature-oriented domain analysis.

read more

Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Recommended Steps for Thematic Synthesis in Software Engineering

TL;DR: This paper conceptualizes the thematic synthesis approach in software engineering as a scientific inquiry involving five steps that parallel those of primary research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research synthesis in software engineering

TL;DR: It is concluded that, despite the focus on systematic reviews, there is limited attention paid to research synthesis in software engineering and a repertoire of synthesis methods needs to be an integral part of systematic reviews to increase their significance and utility for research and practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

A method for evaluating rigor and industrial relevance of technology evaluations

TL;DR: The model is applied and validated in a comprehensive systematic literature review of evaluations of requirements engineering technologies published in software engineering journals and shows that the model can be applied to characterize evaluations in requirements engineering.
Journal Article

COVAMOF: A framework for modeling variability in software product families

TL;DR: A framework for variability modeling—COVAMOF—that provides support for all four requirements and uniformly represent variation points as first-class entities in all abstraction layers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Requirements engineering for software product lines: A systematic literature review

TL;DR: Assessment of research quality, synthesize evidence to suggest important implications for practice, and identify research trends, open problems, and areas for improvement in requirements engineering within SPLE.
References
More filters
Book

Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches

TL;DR: The eagerly anticipated fourth edition of the title that pioneered the comparison of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research design, John W, Creswell as discussed by the authors, includes a preliminary consideration of philosophical assumptions, a review of the literature, an assessment of the use of theory in research approaches, and reflections about the importance writing and ethics in scholarly inquiry.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches

TL;DR: In this article, a nova edicao do conhecido livro sobre metodologia de pesquisa de Creswell is presented, e uma obra excelente de referencia for cursos introdutorios de metodology-de-pisa em programas de pos-graduacao.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering

TL;DR: This tutorial is designed to provide an introduction to the role, form and processes involved in performing Systematic Literature Reviews, and to gain the knowledge needed to conduct systematic reviews of their own.
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering

TL;DR: This paper aims at providing an introduction to case study methodology and guidelines for researchers conducting case studies and readers studying reports of such studies, and presents recommended practices and evaluated checklists for researchers and readers of case study research.
Book

Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns

TL;DR: The Three Essential Activities: Core Asset Development, Software Engineering Practice Areas, and Single-System Development with Reuse - All Three Together.
Related Papers (5)