scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

An exploratory study of the perceptions of AACSB International’s 2013 Accreditation Standards

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors report on the findings of an exploratory survey designed to measure AACSB member deans' perceptions about the recently revised 2013 Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) Accreditation Standards.
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings of an exploratory survey designed to measure AACSB member deans’ perceptions about the recently revised 2013 Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) Accreditation Standards. In April of 2013, AACSB International released a major revision of its accreditation standards to better reflect the increased globalization of management education. Design/methodology/approach – The present study surveyed AACSB member school deans via e-mail using SurveyMonkey during October and early November of 2013. A total of 1,131 valid e-mail addresses were found for the deans/heads of member schools (accredited and non-accredited). In total, 259 surveys were completed, resulting in a 23 per cent response rate for member schools with valid e-mails (n  1,131). Findings – The present study found that the AACSB membership largely perceives that AACSB accreditation is a basic requirement to be a credible and competitive business school, is an indicator of a quality education and is linked to enhancing a business school’s ability to be effective in faculty recruitment and student placement. Even business school’s holding association of MBA (AMBA) and the European Foundation for Management Development’s International Accreditation Program (EQUIS) accreditation seemed to think that AACSB accreditation is a basic requirement to be a competitive business school. The most notable finding of this study is that most deans indicated that they will be able to meet the 2013 standards. Originality/value – Although at the time of the survey no business school had been subject to review under the new standards, member deans largely felt that the guiding principles and values and the accreditation standards themselves are achievable. In addition, there was widespread agreement that AACSB accreditation is valuable, meaningful and essential in today’s globally competitive environment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrating technology and data analytic skills into the accounting curriculum: Accounting department leaders’ experiences and insights

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report survey results of accounting department leaders concerning their experiences in integrating technology into the curriculum, including their perspectives on implementation status and challenges, as well as their current program offerings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Business School Accreditation in the Changing Global Marketplace: A Comparative Study of the Agencies and Their Competitive Strategies.

TL;DR: In this article, a comparative study of the business accreditation agencies and their competitive strategies, using publically available data such as lists of accredited schools published by the agencies as main data collection method, is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Information Sources and Indicators for the Assessment of Journal Reputation and Impact

TL;DR: This guide describes several information sources that can be used to assist faculty interested in quantitative and qualitative assessments of journal reputation and scholarly impact: Journal Citation Reports, Eigenfactor, Google Scholar Metrics, Elsevier Journal Metric, Excellence in Research for Australia, Cabell’s International, Web of Science, Scopus, Google scholar, and Beall's List.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality through accreditation

TL;DR: In this article, the three main accreditation standards for business schools: EQUIS, AACSB and AMBA were analyzed from a quality management point of view from the perspective of quality management.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment Practices in AACSB-Accredited Business Schools

TL;DR: In this article, the authors report the results of a survey of current assessment practices at 138 AACSB-accredited schools, including their continuing use of indirect measures, the amount of time that assessment takes, the extent of faculty resistance, and the results that assessment yields.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is accreditation good for the strategic decision making of traditional business schools

TL;DR: In this article, the authors take a deliberately provocative stance in assessing the utility of the accreditation process in relation to the strategic decision-making of business schools given increasing amounts of environmental turbulence, competitiveness, and potentially discontinuous change.
Journal ArticleDOI

AACSB Accreditation: Addressing Faculty Concerns

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that given the rapid increase in the number of univeive education institutions, stakeholders in management education are increasingly demanding external validation of learning and quality assurance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accreditation and the Globalization of Business

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that it is unlikely that on-line education and corporate universities will disrupt the environment of traditional business schools and also show that two longer term trends, the growth of for-profit universities and the globalization of business education coupled with the diffusion of accreditation, are likely to have an impact on business school enrollment markets both within and outside the United States.
Related Papers (5)