scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Annoyance due to single and combined sound exposure from railway and road traffic

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, a socio-acoustic survey among 1953 persons aged 18-75 years was conducted in residential areas exposed to railway and road traffic noise with sound levels ranging from LAeq,24h 45-72 dB in a municipality east of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
Environmental noise is a growing and well recognized health problem. However, in many cases people are exposed not to a single noise source - for example, road, railway, or aircraft noise - but to a combination of noise exposures and there is only limited knowledge of the effects on health of exposure to combined noise sources. A socio-acoustic survey among 1953 persons aged 18-75 years was conducted in residential areas exposed to railway and road traffic noise with sound levels ranging from LAeq,24h 45-72 dB in a municipality east of Gothenburg, Sweden. The objectives were to assess various adverse health effects, including annoyance, and to elucidate the impact of exposure to single and combined noise sources. In areas exposed to both railway and road traffic, the proportion annoyed by the total traffic sound environment (total annoyance) was significantly higher than in areas with one dominant noise source rail or road traffic with the same total sound exposure (LAeq,24h,tot). This interaction effect ...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The adverse effects of environmental noise exposure on oxidative stress and cardiovascular risk

TL;DR: An overview of epidemiological, translational clinical, and preclinical noise research addressing the nonauditory, adverse effects of noise exposure with focus on oxidative stress is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure - a review.

TL;DR: Annoyance as a reaction indicator should be evaluated with caution as non-acoustical factors play an important role in annoyance ratings, and technical interventions reducing noise levels may not have impacts on annoyance proportionate to their impacts on sound levels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Annoyance response to mixed transportation noise in Hong Kong

TL;DR: In this article, a study was conducted in Hong Kong to understand mixed transportation noise-annoyance response, and the results showed that annoyance is largely determined by noise disturbance and perceived noisiness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Annoyance, Sleep and Concentration Problems due to Combined Traffic Noise and the Benefit of Quiet Side

TL;DR: Having a window facing a yard, water or green space was associated to a substantially reduced risk of noise annoyance and concentration problems, and if this window was the bedroom window, sleeping problems were less likely.
Journal ArticleDOI

Can road traffic mask sound from wind turbines? Response to wind turbine sound at different levels of road traffic sound.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored if road traffic sound could mask wind turbine sound or increase annoyance due to wind turbine noise, and found that road traffic sounds did not increase annoyance with wind turbine noises.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals

TL;DR: Better estimates of the confidence intervals due to the improved model of the relationship between annoyance and noise exposure are provided, which is easier to use for practical calculations than the model itself.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented synthesis curves for the relationship between DNL and percentage highly annoyed for three transportation noise sources, including aircraft, road traffic, and railway noise, based on all 21 datasets examined by Schultz and Fidell et al. and augmented with 34 datasets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness

TL;DR: The results demonstrate that access to quiet indoor and outdoor sections of one's dwelling supports health; it produces a lower degree and extent of annoyance and disturbed daytime relaxation, improves sleep and contributes to physiological and psychological well-being.
Journal ArticleDOI

Longitudinal surveys on effects of changes in road traffic noise-annoyance, activity disturbances, and psycho-social well-being.

TL;DR: The adverse effects of long-term exposure to a high volume of road traffic were studied in socio-acoustic surveys in 1997 and in 1999 after a substantial reduction in road traffic as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relationship between exposure to multiple noise sources and noise annoyance

TL;DR: The annoyance equivalents model concerning noise annoyance from combined sources and the underlying assumptions are presented and it appears that independence will be violated substantially only due to the effect of the presence or absence of a quiet side of building which is not incorporated in the model.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Should I buy noise Colorfit Pro 2?

Effects of the total sound exposure should be considered in risk assessments and in noise mitigation activities.