scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

ANOPP Landing-Gear Noise Prediction with Comparison to Model-Scale Data

TLDR
This is the first time an extensive set of landing gear noise directivity data are available to compare and assess predictive capabilities, and both methods predict comparable amplitudes and trends for the flyover locations, but deviate at sideline locations.
Abstract
The NASA Aircraft NOise Prediction Program (ANOPP) includes two methods for computing the noise from landing gear: the "Fink" method and the "Guo" method. Both methods have been predominately validated and used to predict full-scale landing gear noise. The two methods are compared, and their ability to predict the noise for model-scale landing gear is investigated. Predictions are made using both the Fink and Guo methods and compared to measured acoustic data obtained for a high-fidelity, 6.3%-scale, Boeing 777 main landing gear. A process is developed by which full-scale predictions can be scaled to compare with model-scale data. The measurements were obtained in the NASA Langley Quiet Flow Facility for a range of Mach numbers at a large number of observer polar (flyover) and azimuthal (sideline) observer angles. Spectra and contours of the measured sound pressure levels as a function of polar and azimuthal angle characterize the directivity of landing gear noise. Comparisons of predicted noise spectra and contours from each ANOPP method are made. Both methods predict comparable amplitudes and trends for the flyover locations, but deviate at the sideline locations. Neither method fully captures the measured noise directivity. The availability of these measured data provides the opportunity to further understand and advance noise prediction capabilities, particularly for noise directivity.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Almost 40 Years of Airframe Noise Research: What Did We Achieve?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a concise survey of the achievements in airframe noise source description and reduction over the last 40 years worldwide and provide examples but do not claim to be complete.
Journal ArticleDOI

Aircraft noise prediction

TL;DR: It is contended that the field of aircraft noise prediction has not yet reached a sufficient level of maturity, in particular, some parametric effects cannot be investigated, issues of accuracy are not currently addressed, and validation standards are still lacking.
Journal ArticleDOI

Noise Spectra and Directivity for a Scale-Model Landing Gear

TL;DR: In this article, an extensive experimental study has been conducted to acquire detailed noise spectra and directivity data for a high-fidelity, 6.3-scale, Boeing 777 main landing gear.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the precise implications of acoustic analogies for aerodynamic noise at low Mach numbers

TL;DR: In this article, the authors make a clear statement of the scaling which may be expected with rigour for transportation or other noise at low Mach numbers M, based on Lighthill's and Curle's theories of 1952 and 1955.
Journal ArticleDOI

Magnetic levitation assisted aircraft take-off and landing (feasibility study - GABRIEL concept)

TL;DR: A systematic overview of the investigation of the possible use of magnetic levitation technology to assist the commercial aircraft take-off and landing processes and the demonstrations, validations showing the feasibility of the radically new concept are outlined.
References
More filters

Airfoil self-noise and prediction

TL;DR: In this article, a prediction method for the self-generated noise of an airfoil blade encountering smooth flow was developed for a large scale-model helicopter rotor, and the predictions compared well with experimental broadband noise measurements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Detached-Eddy Simulations Over a Simplified Landing Gear

TL;DR: In this article, a generic airliner landing-gear truck is calculated using the methods of Detached-Eddy Simulation, and of Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations, with the Spalart-Allmaras one-equation model.

Aircraft noise prediction program theoretical manual, part 2

TL;DR: The prediction of data which affect noise generation and propagation is addressed, including the aircraft flight dynamics, the source noise parameters, and the propagation effects.

Airframe Noise Prediction Method

TL;DR: In this article, a noise component method is presented for calculating airframe noise, where the clean wing and tail surface noise is represented as a lift dipole normal to the deflected flap, with amplitude and spectrum given by a correlation of flyover data.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Full-Scale Noise Testing on Airbus Landing Gears in the German-Dutch Wind Tunnel.

TL;DR: In this paper, full-scale landing gears of an A320 aircraft were tested in the German-Dutch wind tunnel and the results showed that aerodynamically generated noise from landing gears turn out to be of broadband nature with constant levels up to several kHz.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (2)
How do I set the time on my noise Pro 3 assist?

This is the first time an extensive set of landing gear noise directivity data are available to compare and assess predictive capabilities.

How do I know my noise Airpods are fully charged?

Neither method fully captures the measured noise directivity.