scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Applying the Electronic Health Literacy Lens: Systematic Review of Electronic Health Interventions Targeted at Socially Disadvantaged Groups.

TLDR
It is highlighted that eHealth literacy is generally overlooked in developing eHealth interventions targeted at socially disadvantaged groups, whereas evidence about the effectiveness of such interventions is limited.
Abstract
Background: Electronic health (eHealth) has the potential to improve health outcomes. However, eHealth systems need to match the eHealth literacy needs of users to be equitably adopted. Socially disadvantaged groups have lower access and skills to use technologies and are at risk of being digitally marginalized, leading to the potential widening of health disparities. Objective: This systematic review aims to explore the role of eHealth literacy and user involvement in developing eHealth interventions targeted at socially disadvantaged groups. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across 10 databases for eHealth interventions targeted at older adults, ethnic minority groups, low-income groups, low-literacy groups, and rural communities. The eHealth Literacy Framework was used to examine the eHealth literacy components of reviewed interventions. The results were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 51 studies reporting on the results of 48 interventions were evaluated. Most studies were targeted at older adults and ethnic minorities, with only 2 studies focusing on low-literacy groups. eHealth literacy was not considered in the development of any of the studies, and no eHealth literacy assessment was conducted. User involvement in designing interventions was limited, and eHealth intervention developmental frameworks were rarely used. Strategies to assist users in engaging with technical systems were seldom included in the interventions, and accessibility features were limited. The results of the included studies also provided inconclusive evidence on the effectiveness of eHealth interventions. Conclusions: The findings highlight that eHealth literacy is generally overlooked in developing eHealth interventions targeted at socially disadvantaged groups, whereas evidence about the effectiveness of such interventions is limited. To ensure equal access and inclusiveness in the age of eHealth, eHealth literacy of disadvantaged groups needs to be addressed to help avoid a digital divide. This will assist the realization of recent technological advancements and, importantly, improve health equity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Disparities in Health Care and the Digital Divide.

TL;DR: For example, this article found that being impoverished, female, and black all correlate with decreased probability of completing a telehealth visit, and millions of americans have insufficient internet access to complete telehealth visits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social and Demographic Patterns of Health-Related Internet Use Among Adults in the United States: A Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

TL;DR: Using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, HINTS 5 cycle 1, HRIU was examined across healthcare, health information seeking, and participation on social media and primary predictors were gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, income, and nativity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions: Application of the Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) Process.

TL;DR: By harnessing collective creativity through co-design, the Ophelia process has been shown to assist the development of solutions with the potential to improve health and equity outcomes in the digital context.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rural use of health service and telemedicine during COVID-19: The role of access and eHealth literacy

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a cross-sectional design to investigate the role of eHealth literacy in telemedicine access, use, and satisfaction in rural access and use in the CoVID-19 pandemic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health education interventions to promote health literacy in adults with selected non-communicable diseases living in low-to-middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the effectiveness of health literacy interventions on health literacy in the management of patients with selected non-communicable diseases living in low-to-middle income countries (LMIC).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

TL;DR: The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

TL;DR: A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
Journal ArticleDOI

Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions

TL;DR: There was a trend towards higher precision that needs to be investigated in a larger study to determine if PICO can improve the relevancy of search results, and this pilot study could not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the search protocols.
Journal ArticleDOI

A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions.

TL;DR: The EPHPP has demonstrated the ability to adapt the most current methods of systematic literature reviews of effectiveness to questions related to public health nursing and has been successful in attracting external funds.
Related Papers (5)