scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Author Gender Inequality in Medical Imaging Journals and the COVID-19 Pandemic.

TLDR
In this article, the authors conducted a descriptive bibliometric analysis of the gender of the first and last authors of manuscripts submitted to the top 50 medical imaging journals from March to May 2020 (n = 2480).
Abstract
Background Early reports show the unequal effect the COVID-19 pandemic might have on men versus women engaged in medical research. Purpose To investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on scientific publishing by female physicians in medical imaging. Materials and Methods The authors conducted a descriptive bibliometric analysis of the gender of the first and last authors of manuscripts submitted to the top 50 medical imaging journals from March to May 2020 (n = 2480) compared with the same period of the year in 2018 (n = 2238) and 2019 (n = 2355). Manuscript title, date of submission, first and last names of the first and last authors, journal impact factor, and author country of provenance were recorded. The Gender-API software was used to determine author gender. Statistical analysis comprised χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results Percentages of women listed as first and last authors were 31.6% (1172 of 3711 articles) and 19.3% (717 of 3711 articles), respectively, in 2018-2019 versus 32.3% (725 of 2248 articles) and 20.7% (465 of 2248 articles) in 2020 (P = .61 and P = .21, respectively). For COVID-19-related articles, 35.2% (89 of 253 articles) of first authors and 20.6% (52 of 253 articles) of last authors were women. No associations were found between first- and last-author gender, year of publication, and region of provenance. First and last authorship of high-ranking articles was not in favor of North American women whatever the year (odds ratio [OR], 0.79 [P = .05] and 0.72 [P = .02], respectively). Higher rates of female last authorship of high-ranking articles were observed in Europe (P = .003) and of female first authorship of low-ranking publications in Asia in 2020 (OR, 1.38; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.92; P = .06). Female first and last authorship of COVID-19-related articles was overrepresented for lowest-rank publications (P = .02 and P = .01, respectively). Conclusion One in three first authors and one in five last authors were women in 2018-2019 and 2020, respectively. Although the first 2020 lockdown did not diminish the quantity of women-authored publications, the impact on the quality was variable. ©RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Robbins and Khosa in this issue.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Female authorship of covid-19 research in manuscripts submitted to 11 biomedical journals: cross sectional study.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe prominent authorship positions held by women and the overall percentage of women co-authoring manuscripts submitted during the covid-19 pandemic compared with the previous two years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diversity and inclusion in radiology: a necessity for improving the field

TL;DR: In the field of radiology, the proportion of women and minorities represented in radiology diminishes as their rank or job title elevates as discussed by the authors, due to implicit biases, generational attitudes, and workplace cultures that can be discriminatory towards women and minority.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19 Pandemic Related Research in Africa: Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Output, Collaborations and Scientific Leadership.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the strength of collaborations and partnerships between African researchers and scholars from the rest of the world during the COVID-19 pandemic, collecting data from electronic scholarly databases such as Web of Science (WoS), PubMed/MEDLINE and African Journals OnLine (AJOL).
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender imbalance in gynecologic oncology authorship and impact of COVID-19 pandemic

TL;DR: There remains gender disparity in senior authorship and editorial board representation in gynecologic oncology journals, and this presents an opportunity for the academic publishing community to advocate for deliberate strategies to achieve gender parity.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Gendered Impact on Indian Physicians.

TL;DR: The 2018 WHO health workforce report analyzing gender equity in 104 countries reported that although women constituted 70% of the workers, they were less likely to be employed full-time and... as mentioned in this paper.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science

TL;DR: Sugimoto et al. as mentioned in this paper presented a bibliometric analysis confirming that gender imbalances persist in research output worldwide, and they concluded that gender imbalance persists in all fields.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender Differences in Time Spent on Parenting and Domestic Responsibilities by High-Achieving Young Physician-Researchers

TL;DR: Whether gender differences exist in time allocation within a population in which differences may not be expected and, if present, would lend insights about the causes of gender differences in domestic labor more generally and relevant information for policy development specifically within the medical profession is investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.

TL;DR: A survey of principal investigators indicates that female scientists, those in the ‘bench sciences’ and, especially, scientists with young children experienced a substantial decline in time devoted to research under COVID-19.
Journal ArticleDOI

Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines.

TL;DR: In this paper, a bibliometric analysis of academic publishing careers by reconstructing the complete publication history of over 1.5 million gender-identified authors whose publishing career ended between 1955 and 2010, covering 83 countries and 13 disciplines.
Journal ArticleDOI

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

TL;DR: Men were preferred for male-dominated jobs, whereas no strong preference for either gender was found for female-dominated or integrated jobs and gender-role congruity bias did not differ between decisions that required comparisons among ratees and decisions made about individual ratees.
Related Papers (5)