scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscripts

Peter C Gøtzsche
- 01 Aug 1996 - 
- Vol. 17, Iss: 4, pp 285-290
About
This article is published in Controlled Clinical Trials.The article was published on 1996-08-01. It has received 113 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Blinding.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

TL;DR: This update of the CONSORT statement improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias.

Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies

TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (ISBN 978-0470057964) is published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration

TL;DR: The Consort Statement as mentioned in this paper is a group of scientists and editors developed to improve the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) by providing guidance to authors about how to improve their reporting of their trials.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

TL;DR: Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses.

TL;DR: Guidelines are provided in this paper that will assist clinicians in making decisions regarding whether to base a treatment decision on overall results or on the results of a subgroup analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals.

TL;DR: Overall, the reporting of clinical trials appears to be biased toward an exaggeration of treatment differences, and more emphasis should be given to the magnitude of treatment Differences and to estimation methods such as confidence intervals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methodology and Overt and Hidden Bias in Reports of 196 Double-Blind Trials of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis

TL;DR: Important design aspects were decreasingly reported in NSAID trials over the years, whereas the quality of statistical analysis improved, and it is not obvious how a reliable meta-analysis could be done in these trials.
Related Papers (5)