scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook ChapterDOI

Clinical Prediction Models

About
The article was published on 2013-02-01 and is currently open access. It has received 435 citations till now.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Clinical prediction models
Hendrik-Jan Mijderwijk
1
& Thomas Beez
1
& Daniel nggi
1
& Daan Nieboer
2
Received: 27 February 2020 /Accepted: 6 March 2020
#
The Author(s) 2020
Dear Editor:
The number of articles presenting a neurosurgical prediction
model is rapidly increasing [1]. Although the number of pub-
lications reporting a clinical prediction model in Childs
Nervous System, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics,and
Pediatric Neurosurgery is relatively constant over the years
(Fig. 1a), circa two-thirds of these publications have been
published since 2015 (Fig. 1b). Nowadays, with the rise of
so many prediction models, we should be able to make firm
conclusions which model to use on our patients.
Clinical prediction models aim to predict an outcome of
interest, for example, survival in high-grade glioma (HGG)
patients or intraventricula r hemorrhage in preterm infants, by
combining two or more patient-related variables. The obtained
predictions of these models can then be used for medical and
shared decision-making such as initiating surgical treatment,
and for example for guidance in planning future lifestyle.
The developm ent and evaluation of clinical predi ction
models involve multiple methodological steps. It is well-
known that these steps are often inadequately addressed and/
or inadequately reported in a publication which clearly limits
the usefulness of the presented prediction model. Utilizing
invalid prediction models may jeopardize adequate decision-
making in our daily clinical practice. Therefore, we want to
point out a few crucial aspects of prediction models.
1. Sample sizeIn clinical prediction model studies, the
number of events in the study population defines the ef-
fective sample size. As a rule of thumb, the minimum
required number of 10 events per prognostic variable
considered has been generally accepted; although recent-
ly,moreadvancedcalculationshavebeenproposedwhich
may yield a different ratio. The number of events is the
smaller of the number of patients having the event or not
having the event. Thus, if in a set of 110 HGG patients, 50
HGG patients died during the study period, considering
up to 5 prognostic variables seems reasonable for the de-
velopment of a prediction model. Considering too many
prognostic variables increases the risk of overfitting [2].
Overfitted models show promising results when evaluated
on the patients on which the model was developed but
show disappointing results when applied to other sets of
patients. This point is essential because many pediatric
neurosurgical studies have relatively low effective sample
sizes.
2. ValidationIt is vital to gauge the validity of the predic-
tions provided by a prediction model. As a result of
overfitting, prediction models tend to have a too optimis-
tic predictive performance in terms of discrimination and
calibration [2]. Internal validation aims to quantify this
optimism. These techniques reuse the same set of patients
on which the model was developed. This step is a mini-
mum requirement for publication of a prediction model.
External validation assesses the performance of the pre-
diction model on a different set of patients, for example,
collected at other geographical locations and/or time pe-
riods. External validation is imperative before a clinical
uptake of the proposed model can take place.
3. ReportingGuidelines for reporting prediction models
do exist. The TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multi-
variable prediction model for individual prognosis or di-
agnosis) guideline together with its e xplanatory paper
provides crucial information for the design, conduction,
and evaluation of a prediction model [3, 4]. It is highly
recommended to adhere to the items of the TRIPOD
checklist for proper and transparent reporting. Often
graphical presentations of the underlying statistical model
are provided in a publication, but (statistical) details are
lacking. For example, when Cox regression is used for
predicting survival, the regression coefficients and the
* Hendrik-Jan Mijderwijk
Hendrik-Jan.Mijderwijk@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich-Heine University Medical
Center, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
2
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical
Center Rotterdam, s Gravendijkwal 230, 3015
CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Child's Nervous System
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04577-8

baseline survival at a given timepoint should be reported
to enable external validation.
We encourage the journal and its readers to critically
review studies on prediction models. Published work does
not always provide sufficient details of the model, al-
though this is necessary to judge the quality of the pre-
diction model. More details of the presented methodolog-
ical concerns and others including the selection of candi-
date prognostic variables and evaluating model perfor-
mance measures have been recently published and illus-
trated with clinical examples specifically for neurosur-
geons [1]. Furthermore, 7 key steps for the development
and evaluation of a neurosurgical clinical prediction mod-
el are tabulated for a quick overview. Pediatric neurosur-
geons should ideally be aware of this methodology as it is
highly con s equ ent ia l t o our daily clinica l pr ac ti ce .
Acknowledgments We thank Maarten F.M. Engel, an information spe-
cialist at Erasmus MC, for performing the literature search.
Funding Information Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author
states that there is no conflict of interest.
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
0
10
20
30
40
Year of publication
Number of publications
Total Pediatric
Neurosurgical Clinical
Prediction Models
Clinical Prediction Models
published in Child's Nervous
System
Clinical Prediction Models
published in Journal of
Neurosurgery Pediatrics
Clinical Prediction Models
published in Pediatric
Neurosurgery
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
0
10
20
30
40
Year of publication
Number of publications
Total Pediatric
Neurosurgical Clinical
Prediction Models
Total Pediatric
Neurosurgical Clinical
Prediction Models
Nervous System, Journal
of Neurosurgery
Pediatrics, and Pediatric
Neurosurgery
a
b
Fig. 1 a, b Time trends of the published number of pediatric neurosurgical
clinical prediction models according to the following systematic searches in
PubMed until December 31, 2019. For the black results: (Prognostic-
index* OR Prognostic-rule* OR Prognostic-model* OR prognostic-scor*
OR prediction-index* OR prediction-rule* OR prediction-model* OR
prediction-scor* OR predictive-index* OR predictive-rule* OR
predictive-model* OR predictive-scor*) AND (Neurosurgery [mh] OR
Neurosurgical Procedures [mh] OR Neurosurg* OR Neurological-surg*)
AND (child[mh] OR Infant [mh] OR Adolescent[mh] OR
Minors[mh] OR Pediatrics[mh] OR Child Health Services[mh] OR
Hospitals, Pediatric[mh] OR Intensive Care Units, Pediatric[Mesh] OR
infan*[tiab] OR newborn*[tiab] OR new born*[tiab] OR baby [tiab] OR
babies [tiab] OR neonat* [tiab] OR perinat*[tia b] OR postnat*[t iab] OR
prematur*[tiab] OR pre-matur*[tiab] OR child [mesh] OR child [tiab] OR
childs [tiab] OR childhood*[tiab] OR children*[tiab] OR kid [tiab] OR
kids [tiab] OR toddler*[tiab] OR adoles*[tiab ] OR teen*[tiab] OR
boy*[tiab] OR girl*[tiab] OR minors*[tiab] OR underag*[tiab] OR under
age*[tiab] OR under aging [tiab] OR under ageing [tiab] OR juvenil*[tiab]
OR youth*[tiab] OR kindergar*[tiab] OR puber*[tiab] OR pubescen*[tiab]
OR prepubescen*[tiab] OR prepuberty*[tiab] OR pediatric*[tiab] OR
peadiatric*[tiab] OR schoolchil d*[tiab] OR preschool*[tiab ] OR
highschool*[tiab] OR suckling*[tiab] OR PICU [tiab] OR N ICU [tiab]
OR PICUs [tiab] OR NICUs [tiab]). For the colored results: (Prognostic-
index* OR Prognostic-rule* OR Prognostic-model* OR prognostic-scor*
OR prediction-index* OR prediction-rule* OR prediction-model* OR
prediction-scor* OR predictive-index* OR predictive-rule* OR
predictive-model* OR predictive-scor*) AND (Neurosurgery [mh] OR
Neurosurgical Procedures [mh] OR Neurosurg* OR Neurological-surg*)
AND (Childs Nerv Syst[Journal] OR Journal of Neurosurgery
Pediatrics[Journal] OR Pediatric Neurosurgery[Journal])
Childs Nerv Syst

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adap-
tation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as
you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, pro-
vide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were
made. The images or other third party material in this article are included
in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a
credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's
Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
References
1. Mijderwijk HJ, Steyerberg EW, Steiger HJ, Fischer I, Kamp MA
(2019) Fundamentals of clinical prediction modeling for the
neurosurgeon. Neurosurgery 85:302311. https://doi.org/10.1093/
neuros/nyz282
2. Steyerberg EW (2019) Clinical prediction models. A practical ap-
proach to development, validation, and updating. Springer, New
York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16399-0
3. Coll ins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM (2015)
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for indi-
vidual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.
BMC Med 13:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z
4. Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JPA, Macaskill P,
Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Ransohoff DF, Collins GS (2015)
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for indi-
vidual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elabora-
tion. Ann Intern Med 162:W1W73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-
0698
PublishersnoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Childs Nerv Syst
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Head-to-head comparison of perfluorobutane contrast-enhanced US and multiparametric MRI for breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter study

TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper evaluated whether the diagnostic performance of perfluorobutane (PFB) contrastenhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is similar to that of MP-MRI in breast cancer and whether combining the two methods would enhance diagnostic efficiency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Participatory Systems for Personalized Prediction

TL;DR: This work introduces a family of personalized prediction models called participatory systems that support informed consent, and presents a model- agnostic approach for supervised learning where personal data is encoded as “group" attributes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neural Networks for Survival Prediction in Medicine Using Prognostic Factors: A Review and Critical Appraisal

TL;DR: This work presents the first ever attempt at a large-scale review of survival neural networks (SNNs) with prognostic factors for clinical prediction in medicine, and identifies key characteristics of prediction models and compares ANN's predictive performance to the Cox proportional hazards model.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new data mining-based framework to predict the success of private participation in infrastructure projects

TL;DR: In this paper , a data mining-based framework is proposed to predict the success of private participation in infrastructure projects in developing countries, which consists of imputation of missing values, selection of significant features method, resampling imbalanced classes, and application of classification algorithms, including random forest, logistic regression, and support vector machines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing prediction models when there are systematically missing predictors in individual patient data meta‐analysis

TL;DR: In this article , the authors compare four approaches: a "restrict predictors" approach, where the model is developed using only predictors measured in all studies; a multiple imputation approach that ignores study-level clustering; and a new approach that develops a prediction model in each study separately using all predictors reported, and then synthesizes all predictions in a multi-study ensemble.
References
More filters
Book

Flexible Imputation of Missing Data

TL;DR: The problem of missing data concepts of MCAR, MAR and MNAR simple solutions that do not (always) work multiple imputation in a nutshell and some dangers, some do's and some don'ts are covered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment

TL;DR: An overview is provided of the consecutive steps for the assessment of the model's predictive performance in new individuals, how to adjust or update existing models to local circumstances or with new predictors, and how to investigate the impact of the uptake of prediction models on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes (impact studies).
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models

TL;DR: Improvements in methodology and reporting are needed for studies that compare modeling algorithms for clinical prediction modeling in the literature and found no evidence of superior performance of ML over LR.
Journal ArticleDOI

External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods

TL;DR: The validation methods are applicable to a wide range of prognostic studies and provide researchers with a toolkit for external validation of a published Cox model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics

TL;DR: Efforts are required to avoid poor calibration when developing prediction models, to evaluate calibration when validating models, and to update models when indicated to optimize the utility of predictive analytics for shared decision-making and patient counseling.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (7)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Clinical prediction models" ?

The number of articles presenting a neurosurgical prediction model is rapidly increasing [ 1 ]. Although the number of publications reporting a clinical prediction model in Child ’ s Nervous System, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, and Pediatric Neurosurgery is relatively constant over the years ( Fig. 1a ), circa two-thirds of these publications have been published since 2015 ( Fig. 1b ). 

Clinical prediction models aim to predict an outcome of interest, for example, survival in high-grade glioma (HGG) patients or intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants, by combining two or more patient-related variables. 

The obtained predictions of these models can then be used for medical and shared decision-making such as initiating surgical treatment, and for example for guidance in planning future lifestyle. 

As a result of overfitting, prediction models tend to have a too optimistic predictive performance in terms of discrimination and calibration [2]. 

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. 

with the rise of so many prediction models, the authors should be able to make firm conclusions which model to use on their patients. 

If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.