scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector

TLDR
In this article, the authors analyzed the implications of the EU ETS for the power sector, notably the impact of free allocation of CO2 emission allowances on the price of electricity and the profitability of power generation.
About
This article is published in Climate Policy.The article was published on 2006-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 642 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Windfall gain & Marginal product.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Options to overcome the barriers to pricing European agricultural emissions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors synthesize the work on emissions pricing in agriculture together with the literature on the design of market-based instruments and propose an options space to map policy options, focusing on three key dimensions of policy design.
Posted Content

The Allocation of Emission Allowances Free of Charge: Legal and Economic Considerations

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated whether the practice of allocating emission allowances free of charge may constitute a subsidy and thereby distort international trade, potentially undermining the competitive position of any firm competing in any market with the subsidized entities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intensity Allocation Criteria of Carbon Emissions Permits and Regional Economic Development in China — Based on a 30-Province/Autonomous Region Computable General Equilibrium Model

TL;DR: Yuan et al. as discussed by the authors analyzed the intensity allocation criteria of carbon emissions permits and its influence on China's regional development through the 30-province/autonomous region computable general equilibrium (CGE) model.
Journal ArticleDOI

The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater?

TL;DR: The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) is subject to many criticisms from different stakeholders as mentioned in this paper, including insufficient carbon emissions reduction, the competitiveness losses and the induced carbon leakages, the unfair distributional effects, the frauds and the existence of several other overlapping climate policy instruments.
Posted Content

Understanding the competitiveness implications of future phases of EU ETS on the industrial sectors

TL;DR: In this article, the authors conduct an empirical analysis of cost pass-through ability of producers of selected products within the sectors refineries, glass, chemicals and ceramics of the UK economy.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a framework to assess the economic incentives and distortions that provisions in NAPs can have on market prices, operation and investment decisions, and use both analytic models to illustrate the effects of the incentives, and results from numerical simulation runs that estimate the magnitude of impacts from different allocation rules.

CO2 price dynamics. The implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the relationship between EU emissions trading and power prices, notably the implications of free allocation of emissions allowances for the price of electricity in countries of North-western Europe.
Posted Content

The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that owners of existing generation assets may be better off paying for carbon dioxide emission allowances than having them distributed for free, and that it takes just 7.5% of the revenue raised under an auction to preserve the asset values of existing generators.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that owners of existing generation assets may be better off by paying for carbon dioxide emission allowances rather than having them distributed for free, and that it takes just 7.5 percent of the revenue raised under an auction to preserve the asset values of existing generators.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (9)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Cp_61_47_sijm.pmd" ?

This article analyses the implications of the EU ETS for the power sector, notably the impact of free allocation of CO 2 emission allowances on the price of electricity and the profitability of power generation. As well as some theoretical reflections, the article presents empirical and model estimates of CO 2 cost pass-through for Germany and The Netherlands, indicating that pass-through rates vary between 60 and 100 % of CO 2 costs, depending on the carbon intensity of the marginal production unit and various other marketor technology-specific factors. 

A main purpose of the free allocation of emissions allowances under the US capand-trade programmes for SO2 and NO x , as well as under the EU ETS for CO 2 , is to obtain thepolitical support of large emitters. 

if the infra-marginal unit is more carbon-intensive than the marginal unit, it suffers from a loss, as the increase in power price is lower than the increase in its carbon costs per MWh; notably if allowances have to be bought on the market. 

The extent to which carbon costs are passed through to power prices also depends on changes in the merit order of the supply curve due to emissions trading. 

CO2costs of gas-generated power have also increased over this period, but less dramatically, i.e. from d4 to d11/MWh (partly due to the relatively low – but constant – emission factor of gas-generated electricity). 

As coal generators benefit from this gas cost-induced increase in power prices, this leads to an overestimation of the pass-through rate of CO2 costs for coal-generated power. 

Earthscanshows the costs of CO 2 allowances required to cover the emissions per MWh generated by a coalfired power plant (with an emission factor of 0.85 tCO 2 /MWh). 

in the latter case, some grandfathering to this inframarginal unit may be justified to break even, depending on the relative carbon intensity of this unit. 

While all generators profit from the higher prices, the effect of a smaller market dominates this effect and therefore slightly reduces their revenues.