scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Conceptualization and Measurement of Perceived Risk of Online Education

TLDR
In this article, Allen et al. developed a scale for measuring multiple dimensions of perceived risk in online education programs and found that social factors constitute an important dimension of the perceived risk associated with online education.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Online education (OE) is coming of age. Over the past few years, a stream of technological innovations, from video streaming to virtual online classrooms, has allowed educational institutions and their faculty members the opportunity to experiment with new teaching methods and to offer new types of degree programs beyond the traditional classroom setting. As a result, students are able to enhance their knowledge and to earn degrees without leaving their jobs and families, and in some cases, without setting foot on a college campus. Today's OE programs can allow students to attain their educational goals in a manner that is flexible, convenient and cost effective (Furst-Bowe & Dittmann, 2001; Anderson, Banks & Leary, 2002). The question is, how do they perceive this opportunity? That is, do students perceive online programs as comparable to on-campus work, or do they perceive such offerings as higher risk alternatives? Recent trends appear to suggest that perceptions of OE are becoming more positive. In the five year period from 2002-2007, the number of online students more than doubled (Allen & Seaman, 2008). During the fall 2007 term, nearly 3.9 million students, approximately 20-25% of all students in U.S. colleges, took at least one online course. While many of these students are off-campus students with a wide variety of ages, work experience and family circumstances, about half of all online enrollments are estimated to be traditional students seeking online courses for reasons of convenience (Mayadas, Bourne and Bacsich, 2009). Most of these students are at public institutions; more than two-thirds of all higher education institutions in the United States have implemented some form of online offerings (Allen & Seaman, 2007). Yet, research has shown that the perceptions of people about risk rarely coincide with the actual risk of certain activities (Kaspar, 1979). Moreover, in the context of OE, there is no comprehensive research that measures the way that people assess multiple aspects of risk in relation to their intention to enroll. That is, they may be attracted to this form of education for its convenience, while at the same time, concerned about its effectiveness, their ability to communicate with other students, or their likelihood of success. Understanding these factors is important in the short run, because they may differentially affect students' intention to enroll in online classes at all or their decision to enroll in one program versus another (Campbell and Goodstein, 2001). In the long run, a better understanding of the risks associated with OE may help faculty and administrators to influence the learning process in a positive way. For instance, if social factors constitute an important dimension of the perceived risk associated with OE, then programs can be designed to enhance interaction throughout the learning process using processes that range from old-fashioned team assignments to technologically driven virtual classrooms. Consequently, this study takes the first steps in developing a scale for measuring multiple dimensions of perceived risk in OE programs. The study is organized as follows: First, it describes the notion of perceived risk in OE and defines the types of perceived risk in the OE context. Second, the study creates the item pool that matches the potential dimensions of perceived risk in the OE context and ensures construct validity by using focus groups and a panel of experts to judge the face validity of the construct. Third, the study relates the dimensions of perceived risk to a variety of student demographics to see how different students view online education. THE NOTION OF PERCEIVED RISK IN OE Mitchell (1998) defines risk as "the variation in the distribution of possible outcomes, their likelihood and their subjective values" (Mitchell, 1998). The decision to enroll in an online class involves risk because doing so could lead to unexpected or uncertain consequences, some of which could be negative. …

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hospitality students at the online classes during COVID-19 – How personality affects experience?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore how the personality traits of hospitality students are associated with their level of anxiety and how their learning experience is affected by the recent COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal ArticleDOI

A study on perceived risk in online shopping of youth in Pune: A factor analysis

TL;DR: In this article, a study is done by the researchers to understand the impact of perceived risk on youth of Pune on their online shopping, the finding of the study are the buyers have maximum perceived risk regarding financial risk, social risk, time risk and last but not the least, security risk.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do employees' attributes and capabilities matter the intention to become a supply chain manager? Structural model analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated how the employees' attributes, capabilities, behavioral control and behavioral intentions affect their intention to become a supply chain manager (SCM), and found that attributes are the most crucial factors for the capabilities of employees to become successful SCM.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determinants influencing intention to enrol on an online MBA programme

TL;DR: Investigation of key determinants that influence the students| intention to enrol on an online MBA programme and the moderating effect of demographic variables, namely age and gender, to the relationship model shows that intrinsic motivation, computer self-efficacy, acceptance technology and social risk are the four most essential individual determinants of students | intention.

Employee Resistance to Disruptive Technological Change in Higher Education.

TL;DR: Employee Resistance to Disruptive Technological Change in Higher Education by Barbara Ann Miller MBA, Open University, UK, 2007 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Business Administration Walden University April 2019 as discussed by the authors.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Why Distance Education

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss how distance education can change our approach to learning and how it can change us, through the eyes of its potential, and how to navigate the long journey of addressing some of the educational problems that have plagued us since Sputnik and that have increasingly turned the American public into a group cynical about its own value in the world.
Journal Article

The Instructional Practices of Televised Distance Education at Northern Arizona University

TL;DR: The authors examined current instructional practices of instructional television courses from the perspectives of the students, technical personnel, and professors; three key groups of people necessary for ITV courses to take place, and found that teachers and students are the most knowledgeable about using new technologies.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What is the perceived risk when purchasing an executive education course?

The provided paper is about the conceptualization and measurement of perceived risk of online education. It does not provide information about the perceived risk when purchasing an executive education course.