scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Detection of frame deletion for digital video forensics

Tamer Shanableh
- 01 DecΒ 2013Β -Β 
- Vol. 10, Iss: 4, pp 350-360
TLDR
This paper examines the authenticity of digital video evidence and in particular it proposes a machine learning approach to detecting frame deletion and it is shown that the proposed solution works for detecting forged videos regardless of the number of deleted frames.
About:Β 
This article is published in Digital Investigation.The article was published on 2013-12-01 and is currently open access. It has received 72 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Video quality & Video compression picture types.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Digital video tampering detection

TL;DR: A survey on passive video tampering detection methods is presented; the preliminaries of video files required for understanding video tampering forgery are presented; some open issues are identified that help to identify new research areas in passiveVideo tampering detection.
Journal ArticleDOI

Video content authentication techniques: a comprehensive survey

TL;DR: This paper presents a comprehensive and scrutinizing bibliography addressing the published literature in the field of passive-blind video content authentication, with primary focus on forgery/tamper detection, video re-capture and phylogeny detection, and video anti- Forensics and counter anti-forensics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Passive forensics in image and video using noise features

TL;DR: Various source identification and forgery detection methods using noise features are reviewed and compared and given a broad perspective on various aspects of image and video forensics using noise Features.
Journal ArticleDOI

Motion-Adaptive Frame Deletion Detection for Digital Video Forensics

TL;DR: A new fluctuation feature based on frame motion residuals to identify frame deletion points (FDPs) and is enhanced by an intra-prediction elimination procedure so that it can be adapted to sequences with various motion levels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inter-frame video forgery detection and localization using intrinsic effects of double compression on quantization errors of video coding

TL;DR: A new passive approach is proposed for tampering detection and localization in MPEGx coded videos that can detect frame insertion or deletion and double compression with different GOP structures and lengths and reduce the effect of motion on residual errors of P frames.
References
More filters
Book

Statistics for engineering and the sciences

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a guide to statistical methods for the detection of contaminated fish in the Tennessee River and their application in the development of super-wars and other applications.
Journal ArticleDOI

SRDA: An Efficient Algorithm for Large-Scale Discriminant Analysis

TL;DR: By using spectral graph analysis, SRDA casts discriminant analysis into a regression framework that facilitates both efficient computation and the use of regularization techniques, and there is no eigenvector computation involved, which is a huge save of both time and memory.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting double MPEG compression

TL;DR: It is shown how a doublycompressed MPEG video sequence introduces specific static and temporal statistical perturbations whose presence can be used as evidence of tampering.
Journal ArticleDOI

Temporal Forensics and Anti-Forensics for Motion Compensated Video

TL;DR: This paper develops a theoretical model of the forensically detectable fingerprints that frame deletion or addition leaves behind, and develops a game theoretic framework for analyzing the interplay between a forensic investigator and a forger.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Video forgery detection using correlation of noise residue

TL;DR: In this work, block-level correlation values of noise residual are extracted as a feature for classification in the distribution of correlation of temporal noise residue in a forged video as a Gaussian mixture model (GMM).
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Detection of frame deletion for digital video forensics" ?

This paper examines the authenticity of digital video evidence and in particular it proposes a machine learning approach to detecting frame deletion.Β Consequently, the dimensionality of the feature vectors is reduced using spectral regression where it is shown that the projected features of unaltered and forged videos are nearly separable.Β 

In future work, the proposed solution can be modified and extended in order to determine the exact location of the deleted frames and not just detect the existence of frame deletion.Β 

The mean and standard deviation vectors of the training feature vector set are stored and used for normalizing a feature vector for a video under examination.Β 

Because of inherent visual artifacts and possible fraud, courts usually call upon the testimony of forensics experts to subjectively assess the quality and authenticity of the digital video evidence.Β 

Double compression of MPEG-2 video can also be detected by examining the distribution of quantized DCT coefficients as proposed in [7].Β 

An MPEG-2 codec which is an implementation of the ISO/IEC DIS 13818-2 international standard [18] is used to compress 36 standard QCIF test sequences using VBR and CBR coding.Β 

Prior to the admissibility of the compressed video to a courtroom it is of prime importance to examine the authenticity of the compressed video.Β 

Assessing the quality of the compressed video in the absence of the reference can be performed on the whole video as one unit thus quantifying its quality [1].Β 

In the following experiments, the true positive (TP) rates and the false alarm rates (FA) are reported using KNN (with K set to 1 with an Euclidean distance similarity measure), logistic regression and SVM with a quadratic kernel.Β 

The mean prediction residual energy of non-Intra coded MBs is computed using Equation 4:πœ‡πΈ = 1𝑁⁄ βˆ‘ βˆ‘ 𝑃𝑖(𝑗),𝑖𝑗 𝑖 ∈ {𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠 π‘œπ‘“ π‘›π‘œπ‘› π‘–π‘›π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘Ž 𝑀𝐡𝑠 π‘Žπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘—π‘‘β„Ž π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘šπ‘’} (4)Where N is the total number of predicted MBs in the video sequence for a P or a B frame.Β 

If the corresponding T value becomes insignificant (i.e. the alternative hypothesis 𝐻1 is rejected.), π‘₯1 is removed and the predictors are searched for a variable that generates the highest T value in the presence of 𝛽2π‘₯2.Β