scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted ContentDOI

Development of a Decision Support Tool for Acute Appendicitis

TLDR
In this paper, the authors describe the development of a new decisions support tool (DST) for acute appendicitis and place it in the context of international guidelines for decision aid development.
Abstract
Background: Multiple randomized controlled trials have shown that it is safe and effective to treat appendicitis with antibiotics or surgery. There are no tools available to assist surgeons and their patients in choosing the optimal treatment for each individual patient. Here we describe the development of a new decisions support tool (DST) for acute appendicitis and place it in the context of international guidelines for decision aid development. Methods: The stakeholder engagement and development process for the DST is described. The DST and its development process are placed in the context of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) and the DEVELOPTOOLS checklist for a user-centered design process. Results: A diverse group of over 60 stakeholders were involved in the needs-assessment, development, and evaluation of the DST. The development process met 11/11 of the scored items on the DEVELOPTOOLS checklist. Of the 34 applicable IPDAS items, the current version of the DST meets 31 of them including 6/6 qualifying criteria, 6/6 certification criteria, and 18/22 quality criteria. Conclusions: The novel appendicitis DST was developed with the input of multiple stakeholders. The development process and the tool itself complies with best practices recommended by the IPDAS.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The need for patient decision aids in acute care settings.

TL;DR: This article conducted a four-arm, randomized survey of U.S. adults involving a vignette about post-appendectomy pain management for a friend, including the quantity of opioids commonly prescribed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Randomized Pilot Test of a Decision Support Tool for Acute Appendicitis

TL;DR: In this article , the authors developed a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision-making for acute appendicitis and its effect on decisional outcomes remains unknown, and conducted an online randomized field test in at-risk individuals comparing the decision-support tool to a standard infographic.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Shared Decision Making in Uncomplicated Appendicitis: It Is Time to Include Nonoperative Management.

TL;DR: This study demonstrated nonoperative management was associated with fewer disability days, quicker return to school, and higher quality-of-life scores for both children and their parents at 30 days after surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Basing Information on Comprehensive, Critically Appraised, and Up-to-Date Syntheses of the Scientific Evidence: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards.

TL;DR: The objectives of the International Patient Decision Aid Stan... as discussed by the authors were to "provide information in patient decision aids to be based on the best available research evidence" and "to support patient decision making".
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods for Incorporating Stakeholder Engagement into Clinical Trial Design.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a framework for developing a stakeholder coordinating center (SCC) and describe two examples of how stakeholder engagement can inform study development, such as patient-centered consent documents and appropriate stopping rules for a specific subpopulation of patients with appendicitis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Engaging Stakeholders in Surgical Research: The Design of a Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Study Management of Acute Appendicitis.

TL;DR: This study demonstrates the potential value and effect of involving patients, families, and other health care stakeholders in the design and performance of surgical trials.
Related Papers (5)