scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Endophilia or Exophobia: Beyond Discrimination

TLDR
In this article, a field experiment in which graders at one university were randomly assigned students' exams that did or did not contain the students' names, on average they found favoritism but no discrimination by nationality, and neither favoritism nor discrimination by gender, finding that a changing correlation between endophilia and exophobia can generate perverse predictions for observed market discrimination.
Abstract
The immense literature on discrimination treats outcomes as relative: One group suffers compared to another But does a difference arise because agents discriminate against others – are exophobic – or because they favor their own kind – are endophilic? This difference matters, as the relative importance of the types of discrimination and their inter-relation affect market outcomes Using a field experiment in which graders at one university were randomly assigned students' exams that did or did not contain the students' names, on average we find favoritism but no discrimination by nationality, and neither favoritism nor discrimination by gender, findings that are robust to a wide variety of potential concerns We observe heterogeneity in both discrimination and favoritism by nationality and by gender in the distributions of graders' preferences We show that a changing correlation between endophilia and exophobia can generate perverse predictions for observed market discrimination

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

The natural experiment.

Warren Jv
- 01 May 1970 - 
TL;DR: Direct evidence that seemingly irrelevant events can systematically affect individual perceptions about economic prospects, both on a personal and economy-wide level is provided.
Posted Content

The Effect of Peer Gender on Major Choice in Business School

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate how the gender composition of peers in business school affects women's and men's major choices and labor market outcomes and find that women who are randomly assigned to teaching sections with more female peers become less likely to choose male-dominated majors like finance and more likely to choosing female-dominated major like marketing after graduation.

Blind spots in social resource theory: Essays on the creation, maintenance, and returns of social capital

Marina Tulin
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide new insights into the creation, maintenance, and returns of social capital based on four empirical studies, and conclude that we cannot do away with details.
Posted Content

Discriminating Behavior: Evidence from teachers’ grading bias

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors found that teachers inflate test scores of better-behaved students, and deduct points from worse-behaving ones, and that teachers' decision to approve pupils that are bellow the passing cutoff grade is influenced by how these students behaved in class.
References
More filters
Book

Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

TL;DR: The authors described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, and adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available.
Journal ArticleDOI

Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness

TL;DR: In this paper, the subjective probability of an event, or a sample, is determined by the degree to which it is similar in essential characteristics to its parent population and reflects the salient features of the process by which it was generated.
Posted Content

Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement

TL;DR: The authors disentangles the separate factors influencing achievement with special attention given to the role of teacher differences and other aspects of schools, and estimates educational production functions based on models of achievement growth with individual fixed effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

TL;DR: A review of 122 research reports (184 independent samples, 14,900 subjects) found average r =.274 for prediction of behavioral, judgment, and physiological measures by Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures as mentioned in this paper.
Posted Content

Race and gender in the labor market

TL;DR: The authors summarizes recent research in economics that investigates differentials by race and gender in the labor market, including recent extensions of taste-based theories, theories of occupational exclusion, and theories of statistical discrimination.
Related Papers (5)