scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of the corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-P and Ni-P composite coatings by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the same fundamental reaction is occurring on all the coatings of the present study but over a different effective area in each case, which can be attributed to the decrease in the effective metallic area prone to corrosion.
Abstract
Electroless Ni-P composite coatings have gained a good deal of popularity and acceptance in recent years as they provide considerable improvement of desirable qualities such as hardness, wear, abrasion resistance, etc. The disagreement among researchers on the corrosion behaviour of these coatings warrants a thorough investigation. Among the various techniques available for the determination of corrosion resistance, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is considered to be superior as it provides not only an assessment of the corrosion resistance of different deposits but also enables the mechanistic pathway by which the deposits become corroded to be determined. The present investigation focuses on the evaluation of the corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-P and Ni-P-Si3N4, Ni-P-CeO2 and Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings produced using an acidic hypophosphite-reduced electroless nickel bath, using EIS. The study makes evident that the same fundamental reaction is occurring on all the coatings of the present study but over a different effective area in each case. The charge transfer resistance of electroless Ni-P and Ni-P composite deposits are in the range 32,253–90,700 Ω cm2, whereas the capacitances of these coatings are in the range 11–17 µF/cm2. The improved corrosion resistance obtained for electroless Ni-P and Ni-P composite coatings is due to the enrichment of phosphorus on the electrode surface, which enables the preferential hydrolysis of phosphorus over that of nickel. The better corrosion resistance obtained for electroless Ni-P composite coatings can be ascribed to the decrease in the effective metallic area prone to corrosion. Among the three electroless Ni-P composite coatings, the corrosion resistance is in the following order: Ni-P-CeO2=Ni-P-Si3N4>Ni-P-TiO2.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent advances in electroless nickel‑boron coatings

TL;DR: In this article , the standard EN-B coatings and their properties and highlights the most recent improvements, variants in bath composition and process and applications of electroless nickel-boron; such as the production of lead and thallium-free coatings, the effect of ultrasonics and surfactants, composite and multi-alloy coatings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anodic dissolution of amorphous Ni–P alloys

TL;DR: In this paper, the anodic behavior of amorphous Ni-P alloys containing 23 and 27% P was compared to that of pure Ni. Measurements were performed in 0.1 M sulphate solutions of different pH by means of potentiodynamic polarization and impedance spectroscopy at selected anodic potentials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of Ce4 + on the structure and corrosion resistance of electroless deposited Ni–Cu–P coating

TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of Ce4+ concentration on the structure and corrosion resistance of electroless deposited Ni-Cu-P coatings were investigated using microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), XRD, polarization curve (PC), and electrochemical impedance spectrograph (EIS).
Journal ArticleDOI

Deposition of thin films of Ni–P and Ni–B–P by dynamic chemical plating

TL;DR: In this paper, the capability of dynamic chemical plating (DCP) to deposit both binary (Ni-P) and ternary nickel alloys (NiP-B) is evaluated.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The anodic behavior of amorphous Ni-19P alloys in different amorphous states

TL;DR: In this article, an amorphous Ni-19P alloy prepared by rapid quenching of white heat melt showed a higher anodic dissolution current density in 1 N HCl in comparison with the same amorphized alloy prepared with red heat melt, showing that the difference in anodic behavior between these two as-quenched specimens seems due to the differences in the amounts of quenched-in defects.
Related Papers (5)