scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of the corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-P and Ni-P composite coatings by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the same fundamental reaction is occurring on all the coatings of the present study but over a different effective area in each case, which can be attributed to the decrease in the effective metallic area prone to corrosion.
Abstract
Electroless Ni-P composite coatings have gained a good deal of popularity and acceptance in recent years as they provide considerable improvement of desirable qualities such as hardness, wear, abrasion resistance, etc. The disagreement among researchers on the corrosion behaviour of these coatings warrants a thorough investigation. Among the various techniques available for the determination of corrosion resistance, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is considered to be superior as it provides not only an assessment of the corrosion resistance of different deposits but also enables the mechanistic pathway by which the deposits become corroded to be determined. The present investigation focuses on the evaluation of the corrosion resistance of electroless Ni-P and Ni-P-Si3N4, Ni-P-CeO2 and Ni-P-TiO2 composite coatings produced using an acidic hypophosphite-reduced electroless nickel bath, using EIS. The study makes evident that the same fundamental reaction is occurring on all the coatings of the present study but over a different effective area in each case. The charge transfer resistance of electroless Ni-P and Ni-P composite deposits are in the range 32,253–90,700 Ω cm2, whereas the capacitances of these coatings are in the range 11–17 µF/cm2. The improved corrosion resistance obtained for electroless Ni-P and Ni-P composite coatings is due to the enrichment of phosphorus on the electrode surface, which enables the preferential hydrolysis of phosphorus over that of nickel. The better corrosion resistance obtained for electroless Ni-P composite coatings can be ascribed to the decrease in the effective metallic area prone to corrosion. Among the three electroless Ni-P composite coatings, the corrosion resistance is in the following order: Ni-P-CeO2=Ni-P-Si3N4>Ni-P-TiO2.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of KI on the Corrosion Resistance of Ni-P Electroless Plating Coating

TL;DR: In this paper, the KI was added in the electroless solution of Ni-P electroless coating, and the surface micrograph was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the corrosion resistance of NiP coatings in 3.5% NaCl solution was examined by polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).

Electroless deposition of Ni-P/nano-Al2O3 composite coatings on PET and carbon fibres substrates

TL;DR: In this paper, the results of electroless deposition of Ni-P/nano-Al2O3 composite coatings on pretreated polymeric bases (PET polyester Mylar A type) and on carbon fibres were presented.
Journal Article

Effects of co-deposition of cr2o3 and mos2 on corrosion properties of nanocomposite electroless nickelcoating

TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of the co-deposited particles on corrosion behavior of the coating in 3.5% NaCl media were investigated, and the results showed that both Ni-P and NiP composite coatings had significant improvement on corrosion resistance in comparison to the substrate.
Book ChapterDOI

Electroless Ni-P/Nano-SiO 2 Composite Plating on Dual Phase Magnesium-Lithium Alloy

TL;DR: In this paper, nano-SiO2 particles with Ni-P matrix have been successfully co-deposited onto dual phase Mg-8Li base alloy through electroless plating, generating homogeneously NiP/NiO2 composite coating.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The anodic behavior of amorphous Ni-19P alloys in different amorphous states

TL;DR: In this article, an amorphous Ni-19P alloy prepared by rapid quenching of white heat melt showed a higher anodic dissolution current density in 1 N HCl in comparison with the same amorphized alloy prepared with red heat melt, showing that the difference in anodic behavior between these two as-quenched specimens seems due to the differences in the amounts of quenched-in defects.
Related Papers (5)