FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Experience
Jason E. Faris,Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky,Shaunagh McDermott,Alexander R. Guimaraes,Jackie Szymonifka,Mai Anh Huynh,Cristina R. Ferrone,Jennifer A. Wargo,Jill N. Allen,Lauren E. Dias,Eunice L. Kwak,Keith D. Lillemoe,Sarah P. Thayer,Janet E. Murphy,Andrew X. Zhu,Dushyant V. Sahani,Jennifer Y. Wo,Jeffrey W. Clark,Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo,David P. Ryan,Theodore S. Hong +20 more
TLDR
The use of FOLFIRINOX was associated with conversion to resectability in >20% of patients and the toxicities observed with the use of this regimen raise important questions about how to best treat patients with LAPC.Abstract:
The objective of our retrospective institutional experience is to report the overall response rate, R0 resection rate, progression-free survival, and safety/toxicity of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients with LAPC treated with FOLFIRINOX were identified via the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center pharmacy database. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and safety/tolerability data were compiled. Formal radiographic review was performed to determine overall response rates (ORRs). Twenty-two patients with LAPC began treatment with FOLFIRINOX between July 2010 and February 2012. The ORR was 27.3%, and the median progression-free survival was 11.7 months. Five of 22 patients were able to undergo R0 resections following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation. Three of the five patients have experienced distant recurrence within 5 months. Thirty-two percent of patients required at least one emergency department visit or hospitalization while being treated with FOLFIRINOX. FOLFIRINOX possesses substantial activity in patients with LAPC. The use of FOLFIRINOX was associated with conversion to resectability in >20% of patients. However, the recurrences following R0 resection in three of five patients and the toxicities observed with the use of this regimen raise important questions about how to best treat patients with LAPC.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Predictive value of computed tomography on surgical resectability in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with multiagent induction chemotherapy: Results from a prospective, multicentre phase 2 trial (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113).
T. Bley,Swantje Held,Ralph Keller,Sven Flemming,Armin Wiegering,CT Germer,Barbara Kimmel,Volker Kunzmann,Ingo Hartlapp,Friedrich Anger +9 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the role of current imaging-based resectability criteria and the degree of radiological downsizing in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) after multiagent induction chemotherapy (ICT) in multicentre, open-label, randomized phase 2 trial was assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Routine neoadjuvant chemotherapy for all patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A review of the evidence.
TL;DR: In this article , the authors highlight the rational and existing evidence of using neoadjuvant therapy in all patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAD) and highlight the benefits of using adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with borderline resectability disease.
Journal ArticleDOI
Histologic changes of porcine portal vein anastomosis after electrochemotherapy with bleomycin.
Urban Stupan,Maja Cemazar,Blaz Trotovsek,M Petric,Ales Tomazic,Gorana Gasljevic,Branislav Ranković,Alenka Seliškar,Tanja Plavec,Jerneja Sredenšek,Jan Plut,Marina Štukelj,Ursa Lampreht Tratar,Tanja Jesenko,Alenka Nemec Svete,Gregor Sersa,Mihajlo Đokić +16 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Survivin Splice Variant 2β Enhances Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Resistance to Gemcitabine
TL;DR: In this article , a Gemcitabine resistant (Gem) resistant (GR) cell line, MIA PaCa-2 GR, was created and assessed for its SSV levels and their potential association with GR.
Journal ArticleDOI
Actionable tests and treatments for patients with gastrointestinal cancers and historically short median survival times
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors evaluated predictive blood tests to identify patients who often survive 1 and 2 years in colorectal cancer and intrahepatic bile duct cancers.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Elizabeth Eisenhauer,P. Therasse,Jan Bogaerts,Lawrence H. Schwartz,Daniel J. Sargent,Robert Ford,Janet Dancey,S. Arbuck,S. Gwyther,Margaret M. Mooney,Larry Rubinstein,Lalitha K. Shankar,Lori E. Dodd,Robert M. Kaplan,Denis Lacombe,Jaap Verweij +15 more
TL;DR: The revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions, and a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cancer statistics, 2012
TL;DR: The reduction in overall cancer death rates since 1990 in men and 1991 in women translates to the avoidance of about 1,024,400 deaths from cancer, which can be accelerated by applying existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population, with an emphasis on those groups in the lowest socioeconomic bracket.
Journal ArticleDOI
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Thierry Conroy,Françoise Desseigne,Marc Ychou,Olivier Bouché,Rosine Guimbaud,Yves Becouarn,Antoine Adenis,Jean-Luc Raoul,Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade,Jaafar Bennouna,Jean-Baptiste Bachet,Faiza Khemissa-Akouz,Denis Péré-Vergé,Catherine Delbaldo,Eric Assenat,Bruno Chauffert,C. Montoto-Grillot,Michel Ducreux +17 more
TL;DR: FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage and had increased toxicity as compared with gemcitabine, and is an option for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status.
Journal Article
[New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)].
Hirokazu Watanabe,Morihito Okada,Yasushi Kaji,Miyako Satouchi,Yozo Sato,Yuichiro Yamabe,Hiroaki Onaya,Masahiro Endo,Miyuki Sone,Yasuaki Arai +9 more
TL;DR: This paper is an overview of the new response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1. 1), with a focus on updated contents.
Related Papers (5)
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Thierry Conroy,Françoise Desseigne,Marc Ychou,Olivier Bouché,Rosine Guimbaud,Yves Becouarn,Antoine Adenis,Jean-Luc Raoul,Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade,Jaafar Bennouna,Jean-Baptiste Bachet,Faiza Khemissa-Akouz,Denis Péré-Vergé,Catherine Delbaldo,Eric Assenat,Bruno Chauffert,C. Montoto-Grillot,Michel Ducreux +17 more
Increased Survival in Pancreatic Cancer with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine
Daniel D. Von Hoff,Thomas J. Ervin,Francis P. Arena,E. Gabriela Chiorean,Jeffrey R. Infante,Malcolm J. Moore,Thomas E. Seay,Sergei Tjulandin,Wen Wee Ma,Mansoor N. Saleh,Marion Harris,Michele Reni,Scot Dowden,Daniel A. Laheru,Nathan Bahary,Ramesh K. Ramanathan,Josep Tabernero,Manuel Hidalgo,David Goldstein,Eric Van Cutsem,Xinyu Wei,Jose Iglesias,Markus F. Renschler +22 more