scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Experience

TLDR
The use of FOLFIRINOX was associated with conversion to resectability in >20% of patients and the toxicities observed with the use of this regimen raise important questions about how to best treat patients with LAPC.
Abstract
The objective of our retrospective institutional experience is to report the overall response rate, R0 resection rate, progression-free survival, and safety/toxicity of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients with LAPC treated with FOLFIRINOX were identified via the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center pharmacy database. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and safety/tolerability data were compiled. Formal radiographic review was performed to determine overall response rates (ORRs). Twenty-two patients with LAPC began treatment with FOLFIRINOX between July 2010 and February 2012. The ORR was 27.3%, and the median progression-free survival was 11.7 months. Five of 22 patients were able to undergo R0 resections following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation. Three of the five patients have experienced distant recurrence within 5 months. Thirty-two percent of patients required at least one emergency department visit or hospitalization while being treated with FOLFIRINOX. FOLFIRINOX possesses substantial activity in patients with LAPC. The use of FOLFIRINOX was associated with conversion to resectability in >20% of patients. However, the recurrences following R0 resection in three of five patients and the toxicities observed with the use of this regimen raise important questions about how to best treat patients with LAPC.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of efficacy and safety between standard-dose and modified-dose FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment of pancreatic cancer

TL;DR: If clinically necessary, initiating FOLFIRINOX with 75% of the standard-dose can alleviate toxicity concerns without compromising efficacy, and mFOL FIRINOX showed comparable efficacy but better safety compared to sFOLFIRinoX.
Journal Article

Ablation of the locally advanced pancreatic cancer: An introduction and brief summary of techniques.

TL;DR: According to the literature, thermal ablative methods appear to be more accessible but are implicated with more complications than non thermal ablatives, which show the most promise.
Journal ArticleDOI

Chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer achieves a high rate of R0 resection.

TL;DR: Patients with non-progressive LAPC after ICT and who received IMRT had high rates of local control and prolonged survival and IMRT is safe in patients with LapC.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of radiation therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.

TL;DR: Critically reviews the data supporting or refuting the role of radiation therapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings of PCA management, with a particular focus on determining which patients may be more likely to benefit from radiation therapy.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer statistics, 2012

TL;DR: The reduction in overall cancer death rates since 1990 in men and 1991 in women translates to the avoidance of about 1,024,400 deaths from cancer, which can be accelerated by applying existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population, with an emphasis on those groups in the lowest socioeconomic bracket.
Book

Pancreatic Cancer

Journal ArticleDOI

FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

TL;DR: FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage and had increased toxicity as compared with gemcitabine, and is an option for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status.
Journal Article

[New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)].

TL;DR: This paper is an overview of the new response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1. 1), with a focus on updated contents.
Related Papers (5)