scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Global Autocracies: Strategies of Transnational Repression, Legitimation, and Co-Optation in World Politics

Gerasimos Tsourapas
- 16 Aug 2021 - 
- Vol. 23, Iss: 3, pp 616-644
TLDR
The authors argue that the rise of global migration flows has contributed to the emergence of transnational authoritarianism, as autocracies aim to both maximize material gains from citizens' "exit" and minimize political risks by controlling their "voice" abroad.
Abstract
How, when, and why does a state take repressive action against individuals residing outside its territorial jurisdiction? Beyond state-led domestic forms of control over citizens living within their legal borders, autocracies also seek to target those abroad—from African states’ sponsoring violence against exiled dissidents to Central Asian republics’ extraditions of political emigres, and from the adoption of spyware software to monitor digital activism across Latin America to enforced disappearances of East Asian expatriates. Despite growing global interconnectedness, the field of international studies currently lacks an adequate comparative framework for analyzing how autocracies adapt to growing cross-border mobility. I argue that the rise of global migration flows has contributed to the emergence of “transnational authoritarianism,” as autocracies aim to both maximize material gains from citizens’ “exit” and minimize political risks by controlling their “voice” abroad. I demonstrate that governments develop strategies of transnational repression, legitimation, and co-optation that transcend state borders, as well as co-operation with a range of non-state actors. Bringing work on the international politics of migration in conversation with the literature on authoritarianism, I provide illustrative examples drawn from a range of transnational authoritarian practices by the fifty countries categorized as “Not Free” by Freedom House in 2019, covering much of Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and South America. I sketch an emerging field of international studies research around the novel means that autocracies employ to exercise power over populations abroad, while shedding light on the evolving nature of global authoritarianism.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Arab uprisings and the return of repression

TL;DR: The Arab uprisings of 2011 led to a reassessment of comparative politics research on authoritarianism in the Middle East and North Africa as mentioned in this paper, which made its way from area studies into mainst...
Journal ArticleDOI

Political Control

TL;DR: The authors synthesize a growing literature on political control, including innovative approaches to repression as well as studies of indoctrination, distribution, and infiltration, and argue that tactics of political control can be understood to vary along two primary dimensions: the level of violence and the materiality of state actions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Going after the family: Transnational repression and the proxy punishment of Middle Eastern diasporas

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigate proxy punishment, that is, the abuse of family members at home as a means to manipulate and subjugate dissidents abroad, using diaspora activists from Syria, Iran, Egypt, and Libya.
Journal ArticleDOI

Digitized diaspora governance during the COVID‐19 pandemic: China's diaspora mobilization and Chinese migrant responses in Italy

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors explore how the Chinese diaspora state during the COVID•19 pandemic in 2020 managed to transform a severe health crisis into a geo-political opportunity for transnational nation-building through di-pora governance based on extensive use of social media technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Elite Networks and the Transregional Dimension of Authoritarianism: Sino-Emirati Relations in Times of a Global Pandemic

TL;DR: In this article , the authors explore three transregional public-private elite networks as multipliers for the traveling of authoritarian practices and show that authoritarian diffusion under the umbrella of fighting the pandemic is not spatially bound to geographical proximity or other structural similarities but rather a global phenomenon that state and non-state actors reproduce.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exit, voice, and loyalty : responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states

TL;DR: Zimbardo et al. as discussed by the authors studied the effects of severity of initiation and high penalties for exiting from public goods (and evils) on consumer reactions to price rise and quality decline in the case of several connoisseur goods.
MonographDOI

Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics

TL;DR: Keck and Sikkink as mentioned in this paper examine a type of pressure group that has been largely ignored by political analysts: networks of activists for them influential not mean a developmental services ihss provider payments on.
Journal ArticleDOI

Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective

Abstract: The debate on migration and development has swung back and forth like a pendulum, from developmentalist optimism in the 1950s and 1960s, to neo-Marxist pessimism over the 1970s and 1980s, towards more optimistic views in the 1990s and 2000s. This paper argues how such discursive shifts in the migration and development debate should be primarily seen as part of more general paradigm shifts in social and development theory. However, the classical opposition between pessimistic and optimistic views is challenged by empirical evidence pointing to the heterogeneity of migration impacts. By integrating and amending insights from the new economics of labor migration, livelihood perspectives in development studies and transnational perspectives in migration studies – which share several though as yet unobserved conceptual parallels – this paper elaborates the contours of a conceptual framework that simultaneously integrates agency and structure perspectives and is therefore able to account for the heterogeneous nature of migration-development interactions. The resulting perspective reveals the naivety of recent views celebrating migration as self-help development “from below”. These views are largely ideologically driven and shift the attention away from structural constraints and the vital role of states in shaping favorable conditions for positive development impacts of migration to occur.
Book

The Society of the Muslim Brothers

TL;DR: The history of the Egyptian Revivalist Egyptian movement up to the time of Nasser is described in this paper, with a foreword from a leading scholar of Islam in the English speaking world.
Journal ArticleDOI

The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a theoretical framework that seeks to explain the longevity of autocracies by referring to three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation.
Related Papers (5)