Heat Treated NiP–SiC Composite Coatings: Elaboration and Tribocorrosion Behaviour in NaCl Solution
read more
Citations
Electrochemical methods in tribocorrosion: a critical appraisal
Corrosion and tribological behaviour of electroless Ni–P/nano-SiC composite coating on aluminium 6061
Influence of fluorosurfactants on the codeposition of ceramic nanoparticles and the morphology of electroless NiP coatings
Electroless Nickel-Phosphorus Composite Coatings: A Review
Coatings for tribocorrosion protection
References
Kinetics of the Deposition of Inert Particles from Electrolytic Baths
Electrochemical codeposition of inert particles in a metallic matrix
Electrochemical methods in tribocorrosion: a critical appraisal
Electrochemical methods in tribocorrosion: a critical appraisal
A mathematical-model for the electrolytic codeposition of particles with a metallic matrix
Related Papers (5)
Mechanical, thermal and tribological properties of electro- and chemodeposited composite coatings
The Microstructure and Wear Characteristics of Cu–Fe Matrix Friction Material with Addition of SiC
Frequently Asked Questions (19)
Q2. What is the effect of phosphorous on the structure of Ni–P coatings?
A transition from a crystalline to amorphous structure takes place progressively with phosphorous content in electrodeposited Ni–P coatings, resulting in amorphous structures when it exceeds 15 at.% [2].
Q3. What is the effect of the increase of friction coefficient on the surface?
The increase of friction coefficient values indicates a surface deterioration (material loss, debris formation and cracks), at the same time, the current density increase is related to an electrochemical/ chemical corrosion process on the surface.
Q4. What can be the effect of particles on the surface of a composite?
The presence of debris (from matrix and SiC particle) on the surface, cracks (exposition of substrate), reduction of SiC particles in the composite and residual stress through loading can simultaneously act.
Q5. What is the effect of tribocorrosion tests on the surface of composite coatings?
The results obtained by tribocorrosion tests are probably associated to the reduction in size of the particles incorporated, and consequently increasing of metallic matrix/particle interfacial area.
Q6. What is the friction coefficient of NiP and SiC?
With increasing content of SiC particles in the NiP–SiC composite coatings, a slight increase in the friction coefficient is detected possibly due to the abrasion effect of the hard SiC particles during sliding test.
Q7. What is the main reason for the use of NiP coatings?
studies to improve the properties of NiP coatings have been performed and structures with better wear resistance have been successfully achieved by the incorporation of ceramic particles in the metallic matrix, such as SiC, Al2O3 and Cr2O3 [4–7].
Q8. What is the main reason why Ni–P alloys have attracted the attention of researchers?
Ni–P alloys have attracted the attention of researchers in the last few decades due to its characteristics concerning the effect of phosphorous content on its crystalline structure [1].
Q9. What is the effect of the tribocorrosion tests on NiP–Si?
the tribocorrosion tests revealed that, for the composite coatings with a higher particles incorporation in the metallic matrix (NiPSiC80 and NiPSC200), the increase of volume percentage (vol.%) of SiC particles incorporated compromised the electrochemical properties but improved the wear resistance of these coatings compared to NiP and NiPSiC10.
Q10. What are the major challenges with the codeposition of nanoparticles?
The major challenges with the codeposition of nanoparticles are the achievement of a high level of codeposition, and the agglomeration of particles suspended in the electrolytes.
Q11. What is the effect of the voids on the surface of the NiP–Si?
The results showed that the densities of current developed by the heat-treated NiP–SiC composite coatings increased with the amount of particles incorporated, probably due to the voids produced by discontinuous interface around the particle.
Q12. What is the effect of the voids on the coatings?
It was reported in the literature that there are voids in the composite coatings, producing discontinuous particle/matrix interfaces.
Q13. What is the probability of ejection of particles in the metallic matrix?
It should be considered that the particle is completely incorporated in the metallic matrix after a certain critical thickness of the deposit, when its ejection caused by arriving particles is not possible.
Q14. What is the effect of the corrosion resistance of NiP–SiC?
On the other hand, some studies [22] concerning the corrosion resistance of Ni–P–SiC revealed that the corrosion resistance has a direct dependence of matrix/particles interface characteristics.
Q15. What is the effect of the volume of co-deposited particles on the coatings?
In previous investigations, it was shown [22] that not only the volume of co-deposited particles (SiC vol.%) but also the number of SiC particles per coating area unit (and consequently the SiC particles size) have an influence on the electrochemical behaviour of NiP–SiC composite coatings.
Q16. What is the effect of the increase in current density on NiP–SiC coatings?
In the case of NiPSiC80 and NiPSiC200 a significant wear material loss was not observed but the increase of current density was evidenced, indicating an intensive corrosion process.
Q17. What is the time required for the incorporation of a particle?
The necessary time for the definitive incorporation of one particle is, therefore, a function of the particle size, i.e., the bigger the particle size, the larger the time required to its definite incorporation into the metallic matrix [13].
Q18. What is the effect of the volume of SiC particles incorporated on the corrosion resistance of Ni?
Nevertheless the volume (%) of SiC particles incorporated, and the number of SiC particles incorporated per unit area promoted the increase of current densities developed by NiPSiC80 and NiPSiC200 composite coatings, during tribocorrosion tests (Fig. 6).
Q19. What is the difference between NiP and SiC?
Previous investigations on composite NiP and NiP–SiC coatings (mean size of SiC particles values about 600 nm) revealed that heat-treated NiP coating has a lower wear volume loss compared to composite NiP–SiC coatings in bi-directional ball-on-disc sliding tests [19].