How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism
TLDR
In this paper, a dynamic explanation of norm diffusion in world politics is proposed, which describes how local agents reconstruct foreign norms to ensure the norms fit with the agents' cognitive priors and identities.Abstract:
Questions about norm diffusion in world politics are not simply about whether and how ideas matter, but also which and whose ideas matter. Constructivist scholarship on norms tends to focus on “hard” cases of moral transformation in which “good” global norms prevail over the “bad” local beliefs and practices. But many local beliefs are themselves part of a legitimate normative order, which conditions the acceptance of foreign norms. Going beyond an existential notion of congruence, this article proposes a dynamic explanation of norm diffusion that describes how local agents reconstruct foreign norms to ensure the norms fit with the agents' cognitive priors and identities. Congruence building thus becomes key to acceptance. Localization, not wholesale acceptance or rejection, settles most cases of normative contestation. Comparing the impact of two transnational norms on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), this article shows that the variation in the norms' acceptance, indicated by the changes they produced in the goals and institutional apparatuses of the regional group, could be explained by the differential ability of local agents to reconstruct the norms to ensure a better fit with prior local norms, and the potential of the localized norm to enhance the appeal of some of their prior beliefs and institutions.I thank Peter Katzenstein, Jack Snyder, Chris Reus-Smit, Brian Job, Paul Evans, Iain Johnston, David Capie, Helen Nesadurai, Jeffrey Checkel, Kwa Chong Guan, Khong Yuen Foong, Anthony Milner, John Hobson, Etel Solingen, Michael Barnett, Richard Price, Martha Finnemore, and Frank Schimmelfennig for their comments on various earlier drafts of the article. This article is a revised version of a draft prepared for the American Political Science Association annual convention, San Francisco, 29 August–2 September 2001. Seminars on the article were offered at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, in April 2001; the Modern Asia Seminar Series at Harvard University's Asia Center, in May 2001; the Department of International Relations, Australian National University, in September 2001; and the Institute of International Relations, University of British Columbia, in April 2002. I thank these institutions for their lively seminars offering invaluable feedback. I gratefully acknowledge valuable research assistance provided by Tan Ban Seng, Deborah Lee, and Karyn Wang at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. I am also grateful to Harvard University Asia Centre and the Kennedy School's Asia Pacific Policy Program for fellowships to facilitate my research during 2000–2001.read more
Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Agency and Adaptiveness: Navigating Change and Transformation : Agency in Earth System Governance
TL;DR: The ESG-Agency scholars are well-positioned to apply extensive insights to major emerging questions in the social sciences about adaptiveness and renewal of political and governance systems across many spheres of society as mentioned in this paper.
Book ChapterDOI
Introduction: European refugee law and transnational emulation
TL;DR: The European Union has the most advanced regional protection regime in the world as discussed by the authors and has been widely identified as one that will have a "ripple effect" beyond the EU, particularly with respect to the evolving content of international refugee law by means of changing customary law and UNHCR practice.
Book ChapterDOI
Norms and Diplomacy: The Diplomatic Underpinnings of Multilateralism
TL;DR: For instance, the authors argues that multilateralism is a primary, interrelated norm of diplomatic culture, along with use of force only as a last resort and in self-defense, continuous bilateral dialogue between officially recognized representatives, dialogue that is as open and transparent as possible, and civility and tact as the essence of diplomatic discourse.
Agency and Norms: Who Defines What Ought to Be?
Mike Angstadt,Ina Möller +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the interaction between ESG and norms is discussed, and it is argued that actors who engage with norms exercise agency by shaping, strategically interpreting, and using, as well as managing other actors' interpretations of norms.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regionalizing Health Security: Thailand's Leadership Ambitions in Mainland Southeast Asian Disease Control
TL;DR: In this article, a multi-stakeholder sub-regional governance network for disease control in mainland Southeast Asia has been proposed, where Thailand has taken on a leadership role and has been able to dominate the normative processes of subregional disease control.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
TL;DR: Keck and Sikkink as discussed by the authors examine a type of pressure group that has been largely ignored by political analysts: networks of activists for them influential not mean a developmental services ihss provider payments on.
Journal ArticleDOI
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
TL;DR: The authors argue that norms evolve in a three-stage "life cycle" of emergence, cascades, and internalization, and that each stage is governed by different motives, mechanisms, and behavioral logics.
Journal ArticleDOI
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
TL;DR: The term "New Institutionalism" is a term that now appears with growing frequency in political science as mentioned in this paper, and there is considerable confusion about just what the new institutionalism is, how it differs from other approaches, and what sort of promise or problems it displays.
MonographDOI
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Margaret E. Keck,Kathryn Sikkink +1 more
TL;DR: Keck and Sikkink as mentioned in this paper examine a type of pressure group that has been largely ignored by political analysts: networks of activists for them influential not mean a developmental services ihss provider payments on.
Related Papers (5)
The power of human rights : international norms and domestic change
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Margaret E. Keck,Kathryn Sikkink +1 more