How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism
TLDR
In this paper, a dynamic explanation of norm diffusion in world politics is proposed, which describes how local agents reconstruct foreign norms to ensure the norms fit with the agents' cognitive priors and identities.Abstract:
Questions about norm diffusion in world politics are not simply about whether and how ideas matter, but also which and whose ideas matter. Constructivist scholarship on norms tends to focus on “hard” cases of moral transformation in which “good” global norms prevail over the “bad” local beliefs and practices. But many local beliefs are themselves part of a legitimate normative order, which conditions the acceptance of foreign norms. Going beyond an existential notion of congruence, this article proposes a dynamic explanation of norm diffusion that describes how local agents reconstruct foreign norms to ensure the norms fit with the agents' cognitive priors and identities. Congruence building thus becomes key to acceptance. Localization, not wholesale acceptance or rejection, settles most cases of normative contestation. Comparing the impact of two transnational norms on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), this article shows that the variation in the norms' acceptance, indicated by the changes they produced in the goals and institutional apparatuses of the regional group, could be explained by the differential ability of local agents to reconstruct the norms to ensure a better fit with prior local norms, and the potential of the localized norm to enhance the appeal of some of their prior beliefs and institutions.I thank Peter Katzenstein, Jack Snyder, Chris Reus-Smit, Brian Job, Paul Evans, Iain Johnston, David Capie, Helen Nesadurai, Jeffrey Checkel, Kwa Chong Guan, Khong Yuen Foong, Anthony Milner, John Hobson, Etel Solingen, Michael Barnett, Richard Price, Martha Finnemore, and Frank Schimmelfennig for their comments on various earlier drafts of the article. This article is a revised version of a draft prepared for the American Political Science Association annual convention, San Francisco, 29 August–2 September 2001. Seminars on the article were offered at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, in April 2001; the Modern Asia Seminar Series at Harvard University's Asia Center, in May 2001; the Department of International Relations, Australian National University, in September 2001; and the Institute of International Relations, University of British Columbia, in April 2002. I thank these institutions for their lively seminars offering invaluable feedback. I gratefully acknowledge valuable research assistance provided by Tan Ban Seng, Deborah Lee, and Karyn Wang at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. I am also grateful to Harvard University Asia Centre and the Kennedy School's Asia Pacific Policy Program for fellowships to facilitate my research during 2000–2001.read more
Citations
More filters
Posted Content
The Rise of (Inter-) Regionalism: The EU as a Model of Regional Integration
Tanja A. Börzel,Thomas Risse +1 more
TL;DR: The EU perceives itself as a model for regional integration, which it seeks to diffuse by actively promoting the development of genuine intra-regional economic and political cooperation, the building of issue-related regimes, and the creation of joint institutions for consultation and decision-making in its neighbourhood and beyond as well as between the world regions and the EU as discussed by the authors.
Dissertation
Stealing Signs: How Broken Rules Structure Identity.
TL;DR: The authors investigate how individuals' identities and social networks shape not only their knowledge of the law, but also their tendency to obey or disobey it, using elite amateur baseball players and their illicit relationships with agents as a case study.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reconsidering lock-in effects and benefits from delegation: the African Union’s relations with its member states through a principal–agent perspective
TL;DR: The authors explores the relations of the African Union (AU) with its member states through the lens of principal-agent theory, and considers the AU Commission as an international public administration as a global public administration.
Journal ArticleDOI
Emerging powers and the responsibility to protect: non-linear norm dynamics in complex international society
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify a range of factors that drive participation (or generate hesitation) amongst emerging powers in the development and application of the RtoP and argue that norm evolution is a unique and emergent outcome of complex international society and therefore argues for using complexity thinking as a heuristic to augment current models and explanations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regionalism, sub-regionalism and the politics of identity in Oceania
TL;DR: The authors analyzes regionalization processes and accompanying discourses of regionalism relating to both pan-Pacific and more recent sub-regional developments, paying particular attention to the dynamics of identity politics in the post-independence period and how these have played out in tensions within and between varying exercises in regionalization.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
TL;DR: Keck and Sikkink as discussed by the authors examine a type of pressure group that has been largely ignored by political analysts: networks of activists for them influential not mean a developmental services ihss provider payments on.
Journal ArticleDOI
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
TL;DR: The authors argue that norms evolve in a three-stage "life cycle" of emergence, cascades, and internalization, and that each stage is governed by different motives, mechanisms, and behavioral logics.
Journal ArticleDOI
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
TL;DR: The term "New Institutionalism" is a term that now appears with growing frequency in political science as mentioned in this paper, and there is considerable confusion about just what the new institutionalism is, how it differs from other approaches, and what sort of promise or problems it displays.
MonographDOI
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Margaret E. Keck,Kathryn Sikkink +1 more
TL;DR: Keck and Sikkink as mentioned in this paper examine a type of pressure group that has been largely ignored by political analysts: networks of activists for them influential not mean a developmental services ihss provider payments on.
Related Papers (5)
The power of human rights : international norms and domestic change
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Margaret E. Keck,Kathryn Sikkink +1 more