scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Immediate Effects of Region-Specific and Non–Region-Specific Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The immediate changes in pain intensity and pressure pain threshold after a single high-velocity manipulation do not differ by region-specific versus non–region-specific manipulation techniques in patients with chronic low back pain.
Abstract
Background Manual therapists typically advocate the need for a detailed clinical examination to decide which vertebral level should be manipulated in patients with low back pain. However, it is unclear whether spinal manipulation needs to be specific to a vertebral level. Objective The purpose of this study was to analyze the immediate effects of a single, region-specific spinal manipulation defined during the clinical examination versus a single non–region-specific spinal manipulation (applied on an upper thoracic vertebra) in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain for the outcome measures of pain intensity and pressure pain threshold at the time of the assessment. Design This was a 2-arm, prospectively registered, randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor. Setting The study was conducted in an outpatient physical therapy clinic in Brazil. Patients The study participants were 148 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (with pain duration of at least 12 weeks). Randomization The randomization schedule was generated by an independent statistician and was concealed by using consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. Interventions A single high-velocity manipulation was administered to the upper thoracic region of the participants allocated to the non–region-specific manipulation group and to the painful lumbar levels of the participants allocated to the region-specific manipulation group. Measurements Pain intensity was measured by a 0 to 10 numeric pain rating scale. Pressure pain threshold was measured using a pressure algometer. Limitations It was not possible to blind the therapist and participants. Results A total of 148 patients participated in the study (74 in each group). There was no loss to follow-up. Both groups improved in terms of immediate decrease of pain intensity; however, no between-group differences were observed. The between-group difference for pain intensity and pressure pain threshold were 0.50 points (95% confidence interval=−0.10 to 1.10) and −1.78 points (95% confidence interval=−6.40 to 2.82), respectively. No adverse reactions were observed. Conclusion The immediate changes in pain intensity and pressure pain threshold after a single high-velocity manipulation do not differ by region-specific versus non–region-specific manipulation techniques in patients with chronic low back pain.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

TL;DR: The current evidence on benefits and harms of medications for low back pain is reviewed, including acetaminophen, NSAIDs, opioids, tramadol and tapentadol, antidepressants, skeletal muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, and antiseizure medications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of various mobilization and manipulation therapies for treatment of chronic low back pain.
Journal Article

Noninvasive Treatments for Low Back Pain.

TL;DR: What are the benefits and harms of noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain?
Journal ArticleDOI

Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain

TL;DR: A state-of-the-art overview of the best evidence non-invasive rehabilitation for CLBP is provided, except for pain neuroscience education and spinal manipulative therapy if combined with exercise therapy, with or without psychological therapy.

Practical Evidence-based Physiotherapy

Saad Bindawas
TL;DR: This book is a practical evidence based physiotherapy book that you can open the device and get the book by on-line and the system of this book will be much easier.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.

TL;DR: All three pain-rating scales are valid, reliable and appropriate for use in clinical practice, although the Visual Analogue Scale has more practical difficulties than the Verbal Rating Scale or the Numerical Rating Scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain

TL;DR: As the population ages, the global number of individuals with low back pain is likely to increase substantially over the coming decades, with the highest prevalence among female individuals and those aged 40-80 years.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally.

TL;DR: This review did not identify any studies estimating the total costs of LBP in the United States from a societal perspective, but such studies may be helpful in determining appropriate allocation of health-care resources devoted to this condition.
Book

The Back Pain Revolution

TL;DR: The problem diagnostic triage pain and disability back pain through history the epidemiology of back pain risk factors the clinical course of low back pain the physical basis of simple backache.
Related Papers (5)