Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5.
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A maladaptive personality trait model and corresponding instrument are developed as a step on the path toward helping users of DSM-5 assess traits that may or may not constitute a formal personality disorder.Abstract:
Background DSM-IV-TR suggests that clinicians should assess clinically relevant personality traits that do not necessarily constitute a formal personality disorder (PD), and should note these traits on Axis II, but DSM-IV-TR does not provide a trait model to guide the clinician. Our goal was to provide a provisional trait model and a preliminary corresponding assessment instrument, in our roles as members of the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders Workgroup and workgroup advisors. Method An initial list of specific traits and domains (broader groups of traits) was derived from DSM-5 literature reviews and workgroup deliberations, with a focus on capturing maladaptive personality characteristics deemed clinically salient, including those related to the criteria for DSM-IV-TR PDs. The model and instrument were then developed iteratively using data from community samples of treatment-seeking participants. The analytic approach relied on tools of modern psychometrics (e.g. item response theory models). Results A total of 25 reliably measured core elements of personality description emerged that, together, delineate five broad domains of maladaptive personality variation: negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism. Conclusions We developed a maladaptive personality trait model and corresponding instrument as a step on the path toward helping users of DSM-5 assess traits that may or may not constitute a formal PD. The inventory we developed is reprinted in its entirety in the Supplementary online material, with the goal of encouraging additional refinement and development by other investigators prior to the finalization of DSM-5. Continuing discussion should focus on various options for integrating personality traits into DSM-5.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Further Validation of the MMPI-2-RF Personality Disorder Spectra Scales
Tiffany A. Brown,Martin Sellbom +1 more
TL;DR: The MMPI-2-RF PD Spectra scales showed significant moderate to large correlations with traditional PD measures, with the exception of Histrionic PD, as well as evidenced incremental validity over the MMPi-2RF Personality Psychopathology-5 (PSY-5).
Journal ArticleDOI
Professional Practice Guidelines for Personality Assessment.
Radhika Krishnamurthy,Giselle A. Hass,Adam P. Natoli,Bruce L. Smith,Paul A. Arbisi,Emily D. Gottfried +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present guidelines for personality assessment developed by a work group formed by the Society for Personality Assessment (SPA), which are intended to serve as an aid for best practices specific to personality assessment for professionals, and a source of information for consumers and policy makers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing borderline personality disorder based on the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 – BPD
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a specific version of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2), a self-reported measure developed in Brazil for use in pathological personality traits assessment, focused on the assessment of traits related to BPD.
Journal ArticleDOI
Personality, schizophrenia, and violence: a longitudinal study: the second wave of the VIORMED Project
Gioia Bottesi,Valentina Candini,Marta Ghisi,Mattia Bava,Giorgio Bianconi,Viola Bulgari,Giuseppe Carrà,Giuseppe Carrà,Cesare Cavalera,Giovanni Conte,Marta Cricelli,Maria Teresa Ferla,Laura Iozzino,Ambra Macis,Alberto Stefana,Giovanni de Girolamo +15 more
TL;DR: Irrespective of any history of violence, patients with PD as a primary diagnosis displayed more aggressive behaviors than those with aPrimary diagnosis of schizophrenia during the follow-up, and the most significant predictor of aggressive behaviors over time was endorsing a primary diagnosed PD.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Model-Based Strategy for Interfacing Traits of the DSM-5 AMPD With Neurobiology.
Colin B Bowyer,Keanan J. Joyner,Robert D. Latzman,Noah C. Venables,Jens Foell,Christopher J. Patrick +5 more
TL;DR: Structural modeling is used to evaluate how well alternative configurations of AMPD traits, operationalized using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), interface with neural indicators of externalizing liability and illustrates how AMPD trait configured for use in investigations of biobehavioral risk for psychopathology.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of selecting one of a number of models of different dimensions is treated by finding its Bayes solution, and evaluating the leading terms of its asymptotic expansion.
Estimating the dimension of a model
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of selecting one of a number of models of different dimensions is treated by finding its Bayes solution, and evaluating the leading terms of its asymptotic expansion.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits
TL;DR: This personal historical article traces the development of the Big-Five factor structure, whose growing acceptance by personality researchers has profoundly influenced the scientific study of individual differences.
Journal ArticleDOI
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008
David Cella,William T. Riley,Arthur A. Stone,Nan E. Rothrock,Bryce B. Reeve,Susan Yount,Dagmar Amtmann,Rita K. Bode,Daniel J. Buysse,Seung W. Choi,Karon F. Cook,Robert F. DeVellis,Darren A. DeWalt,James F. Fries,Richard Gershon,Elizabeth A. Hahn,Jin Shei Lai,Paul A. Pilkonis,Dennis A. Revicki,Matthias Rose,Kevin P. Weinfurt,Ron D. Hays +21 more
TL;DR: The first large-scale testing of PROMIS item banks and their short forms provide evidence that they are reliable and precise measures of generic symptoms and functional reports comparable to legacy instruments.