Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5.
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A maladaptive personality trait model and corresponding instrument are developed as a step on the path toward helping users of DSM-5 assess traits that may or may not constitute a formal personality disorder.Abstract:
Background DSM-IV-TR suggests that clinicians should assess clinically relevant personality traits that do not necessarily constitute a formal personality disorder (PD), and should note these traits on Axis II, but DSM-IV-TR does not provide a trait model to guide the clinician. Our goal was to provide a provisional trait model and a preliminary corresponding assessment instrument, in our roles as members of the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders Workgroup and workgroup advisors. Method An initial list of specific traits and domains (broader groups of traits) was derived from DSM-5 literature reviews and workgroup deliberations, with a focus on capturing maladaptive personality characteristics deemed clinically salient, including those related to the criteria for DSM-IV-TR PDs. The model and instrument were then developed iteratively using data from community samples of treatment-seeking participants. The analytic approach relied on tools of modern psychometrics (e.g. item response theory models). Results A total of 25 reliably measured core elements of personality description emerged that, together, delineate five broad domains of maladaptive personality variation: negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism. Conclusions We developed a maladaptive personality trait model and corresponding instrument as a step on the path toward helping users of DSM-5 assess traits that may or may not constitute a formal PD. The inventory we developed is reprinted in its entirety in the Supplementary online material, with the goal of encouraging additional refinement and development by other investigators prior to the finalization of DSM-5. Continuing discussion should focus on various options for integrating personality traits into DSM-5.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Convergent and Discriminant Validity and Utility of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire (DLOPFQ): Associations with Medical Health Care Provider Ratings and Measures of Physical Health.
Sharon M. Nelson,Steven K. Huprich,Kevin B. Meehan,Caleb J. Siefert,Gregory Haggerty,James Sexton,V. Barry Dauphin,Matthew Macaluso,Rosalee E Zackula,Lyle E. Baade,Jennifer Jackson +10 more
TL;DR: The DLOPFQ could be useful for understanding patients’ personality pathology in clinical settings, but relatively modest validity coefficients, as well as poor discriminant validity of domain scales, indicate further research and measure refinement might be needed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Vulnerable Isolation and Enmity Concept: Disentangling the blue and dark face of vulnerable narcissism
TL;DR: In this paper , a theoretical model of the vulnerable half of the Narcissism Spectrum Model (NSM) -the Vulnerable Isolation and Enmity Concept (VIEC) is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Routinized categorization of suicide risk into actionable strata: Establishing the validity of an existing suicide risk assessment framework in an outpatient sample.
Austin J. Gallyer,Carol Chu,Carol Chu,Kelly M. Klein,Kelly M. Klein,Jazmine R. Quintana,Corinne N. Carlton,Sean P. Dougherty,Thomas E. Joiner +8 more
TL;DR: This clinician-administered suicide risk assessment may be useful for standardization of the assessment and management of suicide risk in outpatient clinical settings and provides evidence for the reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the DT.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cross-cultural applicability of ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality disorder.
Olatunde Ayinde,Oye Gureje +1 more
TL;DR: DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder have shown a preliminary evidence of improved utility across cultures, and more studies are needed to confirm this early observation across many more cultural and linguistic groups.
Journal ArticleDOI
Conceptual Models of Borderline Personality Disorder, Part 1: Overview of Prevailing and Emergent Models.
TL;DR: The first of this 2-part review evaluates the major approaches to conceptualizing BPD, from the traditional DSM diagnosis through the more recent Alternative Model in DSM-5, Section III, and the research domain criteria initiative of the National Institute of Mental Health that was articulated largely in response to limitations of the DSM.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of selecting one of a number of models of different dimensions is treated by finding its Bayes solution, and evaluating the leading terms of its asymptotic expansion.
Estimating the dimension of a model
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of selecting one of a number of models of different dimensions is treated by finding its Bayes solution, and evaluating the leading terms of its asymptotic expansion.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits
TL;DR: This personal historical article traces the development of the Big-Five factor structure, whose growing acceptance by personality researchers has profoundly influenced the scientific study of individual differences.
Journal ArticleDOI
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008
David Cella,William T. Riley,Arthur A. Stone,Nan E. Rothrock,Bryce B. Reeve,Susan Yount,Dagmar Amtmann,Rita K. Bode,Daniel J. Buysse,Seung W. Choi,Karon F. Cook,Robert F. DeVellis,Darren A. DeWalt,James F. Fries,Richard Gershon,Elizabeth A. Hahn,Jin Shei Lai,Paul A. Pilkonis,Dennis A. Revicki,Matthias Rose,Kevin P. Weinfurt,Ron D. Hays +21 more
TL;DR: The first large-scale testing of PROMIS item banks and their short forms provide evidence that they are reliable and precise measures of generic symptoms and functional reports comparable to legacy instruments.