scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography

John Brodersen, +1 more
- 01 Mar 2013 - 
- Vol. 11, Iss: 2, pp 106-115
TLDR
False-positive findings on screening mammography causes long-term psychosocial harm: 3 years after a false-positive finding, women experience psychossocial consequences that range between those experienced by women with a normal mammogram and those with a diagnosis of breast cancer.
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer screening programs have the potential of intended beneficial effects, but they also inevitably have unintended harmful effects. In the case of screening mammography, the most frequent harm is a false-positive result. Prior efforts to measure their psychosocial consequences have been limited by short-term follow-up, the use of generic survey instruments, and the lack of a relevant benchmark—women with breast cancer. METHODS In this cohort study with a 3-year follow-up, we recruited 454 women with abnormal findings in screening mammography over a 1-year period. For each woman with an abnormal finding on a screening mammogram (false and true positives), we recruited another 2 women with normal screening results who were screened the same day at the same clinic. These participants were asked to complete the Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer—a validated questionnaire encompassing 12 psychosocial outcomes—at baseline, 1, 6, 18, and 36 months. RESULTS Six months after final diagnosis, women with false-positive findings reported changes in existential values and inner calmness as great as those reported by women with a diagnosis of breast cancer (Δ = 1.15; P = .015; and Δ = 0.13; P = .423, respectively). Three years after being declared free of cancer, women with false-positive results consistently reported greater negative psychosocial consequences compared with women who had normal findings in all 12 psychosocial outcomes (Δ >0 for 12 of 12 outcomes; P CONCLUSION False-positive findings on screening mammography causes long-term psychosocial harm: 3 years after a false-positive finding, women experience psychosocial consequences that range between those experienced by women with a normal mammogram and those with a diagnosis of breast cancer.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

TL;DR: It is found that breast cancer mortality was an unreliable outcome that was biased in favour of screening, mainly because of differential misclassification of cause of death.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Systematic Assessment of Benefits and Risks to Guide Breast Cancer Screening Decisions

TL;DR: To maximize the benefit of mammography screening, decisions should be individualized based on patients' risk profiles and preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Photoacoustic clinical imaging

TL;DR: The various clinical and pre-clinical literature is surveyed and the potential applications and hurdles that still need to be overcome are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

TL;DR: A systematic review updates evidence for the USPSTF on the harms of breast cancer screening, including false-positive mammography results, overdiagnosis, anxiety, pain during procedures, and radiation exposure, and how these adverse effects vary by age, risk factor, screening interval, and screening modality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a multipurpose image analysis software based on deep learning with artificial neural networks for the detection of breast cancer in an independent, dual-center mammography data set.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a class of inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators for the parameters of models for the dependence of the mean of a vector of correlated response variables on the vector of explanatory variables in the presence of missing response data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

TL;DR: Over 10 years, one third of women screened had an abnormal test result that required additional evaluation, even though no breast cancer was present, and Physicians should educate women about the risk of a false positive result from a screening test for breast cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

TL;DR: Biennial screening appears to reduce the cumulative probability of false-positive results after 10 years but may be associated with a small absolute increase in the probability of late-stage cancer diagnosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review.

TL;DR: The results report that mammographic screening does not appear to create anxiety in women who are given a clear result after a mammogram and are subsequently placed on routine recall, however, women who have further investigations following their routine mammogram experience significant anxiety in the short term, and possibly in the long term.
Related Papers (5)