scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Mattering in the community: Domain and demographic differences in a US sample.

TLDR
In this paper, the authors analyzed a representative US sample to identify demographic group differences in domain-specific mattering and found that high incomes, advanced degrees, and employment were most consistently associated with higher mattering across domains.
Abstract
Mattering is defined as experiences of feeling valued and adding value in different domains of life: self, relationships, work, and community. Mattering is a construct with great relevance across psychological and social issues. Research has suggested there may be value in understanding group differences in mattering. Following the recent validation of a scale which measures mattering across multiple domains of life (MIDLS), the present study analyzed a representative US sample to identify demographic group differences in domain-specific mattering. Despite the presence of few differences in Overall Mattering, significant differences were found among all domains and between groups for each demographic variable. Overall, high incomes, advanced degrees, and employment were most consistently associated with higher mattering across domains. In addition, individuals across demographic groups and domains were more likely to report adding value than feeling valued. Age, gender, ethnicity, and marital status correlations were found in certain domains. These results demonstrate the value of a multidimensional conception of mattering and provide initial insight into demographic differences in mattering in a United States, English-speaking sample.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Between wellness and fairness: The mediating role of autonomous human choice and social capital in OECD countries

TL;DR: In this article , the authors explored the role of two potential mediating variables: autonomous human choice and social capital, and found that the OECD Social Justice Index (SJI) is directly linked to country-level life satisfaction, and its indirect effect operates primarily through people's autonomous choices in life and their country's level of social capital.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mattering Mediates Between Fairness and Well-being.

TL;DR: In this paper, a Latent Path Analysis conducted on a representative sample of 1051 U.S. adults revealed a strong direct predictive effect of mattering onto well-being as well as a strong indirect effect of fairness onto wellbeing through mattering.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

TL;DR: Existing evidence supports the hypothesis that the need to belong is a powerful, fundamental, and extremely pervasive motivation, and people form social attachments readily under most conditions and resist the dissolution of existing bonds.
Journal ArticleDOI

Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.

TL;DR: The authors reviewed more than 70 studies concerning employees' general belief that their work organization values their contribution and cares about their well-being (perceived organizational support; POS) and indicated that 3 major categories of beneficial treatment received by employees were associated with POS.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.

TL;DR: It is proposed that, behaviorally, females' responses to stress are more marked by a pattern of "tend-and-befriend," and neuroendocrine evidence from animal and human studies suggests that oxytocin, in conjunction with female reproductive hormones and endogenous opioid peptide mechanisms, may be at its core.
Journal ArticleDOI

High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being

TL;DR: It is concluded that high income buys life satisfaction but not happiness, and that low income is associated both with low life evaluation and low emotional well-being.
Journal ArticleDOI

Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study.

TL;DR: Results indicate that subjective status is a strong predictor of ill-health, and that education, occupation and income do not explain this relationship fully for all the health measures examined, and provide further support for the multidimensional nature of both social inequality and health.
Related Papers (5)