scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire

TLDR
The Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ) is presented, an instrument designed to efficiently assess differences in the generic tendency to engage in conspiracist ideation within and across cultures and predicted beliefs in specific conspiracy theories over and above other individual difference measures.
Abstract
Conspiracy theories are ubiquitous when it comes to explaining political events and societal phenomena. Individuals differ not only in the degree to which they believe in specific conspiracy theories, but also in their general susceptibility to explanations based on such theories, that is, their conspiracy mentality. We present the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ), an instrument designed to efficiently assess differences in the generic tendency to engage in conspiracist ideation within and across cultures. The CMQ is available in English, German, and Turkish. In four studies, we examined the CMQ’s factorial structure, reliability, measurement equivalence across cultures, and its convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. Analyses based on a cross-cultural sample (Study 1a; N = 7,766) supported the conceptualization of conspiracy mentality as a one-dimensional construct across the three language versions of the CMQ that is stable across time (Study 1b; N = 141). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the CMQ items. The instrument could therefore be used to examine differences in conspiracy mentality between European, North American, and Middle Eastern cultures. In Studies 2-4 (total N = 476), we report (re-)analyses of 3 datasets demonstrating the validity of the CMQ in student and working population samples in the UK and Germany. First, attesting to its convergent validity, the CMQ was highly correlated with another measure of generic conspiracy belief. Second, the CMQ showed patterns of meaningful associations with personality measures (e.g., Big Five dimensions, schizotypy), other generalized political attitudes (e.g., social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism), and further individual differences (e.g., paranormal belief, lack of socio-political control). Finally, the CMQ predicted beliefs in specific conspiracy theories over and above other individual difference measures.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination.

TL;DR: The 5C scale provides a novel tool to monitor psychological antecedents of vaccination and facilitates diagnosis, intervention design and evaluation and its short version is suitable for field settings and regular global monitoring of relevant antecedent vaccination.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories.

TL;DR: Current research does not indicate that conspiracy belief fulfills people’s motivations, and it is found that for many people, conspiracy belief may be more appealing than satisfying.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding Conspiracy Theories

TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the literature shows that conspiracy beliefs result from a range of psychological, political and social factors, and that conspiracy theories are shared among individuals and spread through traditional and social media platforms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs scale.

TL;DR: The research indicates that the GCB is a psychometrically sound and practically useful measure of conspiracist ideation, and the findings add to the theoretical understanding of conspiracists ideation as a monological belief system unpinned by a relatively small number of generic assumptions about the typicality of conspiratorial activity in the world.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories

TL;DR: Ass associations between belief in conspiracy theories and a range of measures of thinking dispositions and an alternative method of eliciting analytic thinking, which related to cognitive disfluency, was effective at reducing conspiracist ideation in a student sample.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

TL;DR: In this article, the adequacy of the conventional cutoff criteria and several new alternatives for various fit indexes used to evaluate model fit in practice were examined, and the results suggest that, for the ML method, a cutoff value close to.95 for TLI, BL89, CFI, RNI, and G...
Journal ArticleDOI

Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit

TL;DR: In this paper, two types of error involved in fitting a model are considered, error of approximation and error of fit, where the first involves the fit of the model, and the second involves the model's shape.
Book

Structural Equation Modeling With Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming

TL;DR: Structural Equation Models: The Basics using the EQS Program and testing for Construct Validity: The Multitrait-Multimethod Model and Change Over Time: The Latent Growth Curve Model.
Book

Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming

TL;DR: In this article, the EQS program is used to test the factorial verifiability of a theoretical construct and its invariance to a Causal Structure using the First-Order CFA model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the change in the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) when cross-group constraints are imposed on a measurement model and found that the change was independent of both model complexity and sample size.
Related Papers (5)