Mechanical competition promotes selective listening to receptor inputs to resolve directional dilemmas in neutrophil migration

TLDR: This work challenges chemotaxing HL60 neutrophil-like cells with symmetric bifurcating microfluidic channels and suggests a “selective listening” model in which both actively protruding cell fronts and actively retracting cell rears have strong commitment to their current migratory program.

Abstract: As neutrophils navigate complex environments to reach sites of infection, they may encounter obstacles that force them to split their front into multiple leading edges, raising the question of how the cell selects which front to maintain and which front(s) to abandon. Here we challenge chemotaxing HL60 neutrophil-like cells with symmetric bifurcating microfluidic channels, enabling us to probe the cell-intrinsic properties of their decision-making process. Using supervised statistical learning, we demonstrate that cells commit to one leading edge late in the decision- making process, rather than amplifying early pre-existing asymmetries. Furthermore, we use optogenetic tools to show that receptor inputs only bias the decision similarly late, once mechanical stretching begins to weaken each front. Finally, optogenetic attempts to reverse cell decisions reveal that, once an edge begins retracting, it commits to this fate, with the kinase ROCK limiting its sensitivity to inputs until the retraction is complete. Collectively our results suggest a “selective listening” model in which both actively protruding cell fronts and actively retracting cell rears have strong commitment to their current migratory program.