scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Metabolism and Compartmentation of Imported Sugars in Sink Organs in Relation to Sink Strength

L C Ho
- Vol. 39, Iss: 1, pp 355-378
TLDR
The introduction of Sink Strength and Sink Competition, and the regulation of import by Sink Organs, are described.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 SINK STRENGTH AND IMPORT OF ASSIMILATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 Definitions of Sink Strength. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 Sink Strength and Sink Competition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 CHARACTERISTICS OF SINK ORGANS........ .. . . . . ........ 360 Utilization and Storage Sink Organs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 Reversible and Irreversible Sink Organs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 REGULATION OF IMPORT BY SINK ORGANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 Unloading of Sugars from Phloem Conducting Tissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 Uptake of Sugars by Sink Cells .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 365 Chemical Conversion of Sugars Inside Sink Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 Physical Compartmentation of Sugars Inside Sink Cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368 DETERMINATION OF SINK STRENGTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370 Genetic Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370 Genetic Expression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 CONCLUDING REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The dilemma of plants: To grow or defend.

TL;DR: A conceptual model of the evolution of plant defense is concluded, in which plant physioligical trade-offs interact with the abiotic environment, competition and herbivory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fruits: A Developmental Perspective.

TL;DR: It is illustrated that fruit development is a potentially useful system to learn more about complex regulatory mechanisms that control the division, growth, and differentiation of plant cells.
Journal ArticleDOI

Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors

TL;DR: Current knowledge about the phloem transport mechanisms is summarized and the effects of several abiotic (water and salt stress, mineral deficiency, CO2, light, temperature, air, and soil pollutants) and biotic andmutualistic and pathogenic microbes, viruses, aphids, and parasitic plants are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage

TL;DR: This work states that tolerance to consumer damage may be favored under a range of conditions, even when the risk and intensity of damage varies, and suggests that external constraints such as pollinator abundance or nutrient availability may also limit the evolution of tolerance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Soluble sugars--metabolism, sensing and abiotic stress: a complex network in the life of plants.

TL;DR: Recent evidences how plants sense and respond to environmental factors through sugar-sensing mechanisms are reviewed and it is thought that forward and reverse genetic analysis in combination with expression profiling must be continued to uncover many signalling components, and a full biochemical characterization of the signalling complexes will be required to determine specificity and cross-talk in abiotic stress signalling pathways.