scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The fourth edition of the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes as mentioned in this paper has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.
Abstract
The purpose of economic evaluation is to inform decisions intended to improve healthcare. The new edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes equips the reader with the necessary tools and understanding required to undertake evaluations by providing an outline of key principles and a 'tool kit' based on the authors' own experiences of undertaking economic evaluations. Building on the strength of the previous edition, the accessible writing style ensures the text is key reading for the non-expert reader, as no prior knowledge of economics is required. The book employs a critical appraisal framework, which is useful both to researchers conducting studies and to decision-makers assessing them. Practical examples are provided throughout to aid learning and understanding. The book discusses the analytical and policy challenges that face health systems in seeking to allocate resources efficiently and fairly. New chapters include 'Principles of economic evaluation' and 'Making decisions in healthcare' which introduces the reader to core issues and questions about resource allocation, and provides an understanding of the fundamental principles which guide decision making. A key part of evidence-based decision making is the analysis of all the relevant evidence to make informed decisions and policy. The new chapter 'Identifying, synthesising and analysing evidence' highlights the importance of systematic review, and how and why these methods are used. As methods of analysis continue to develop, the chapter on 'Characterising, reporting and interpreting uncertainty' introduces the reader to recent methods of analysis and why characterizing uncertainty matters for health care decisions. The fourth edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The hepatitis C cascade of care: identifying priorities to improve clinical outcomes.

TL;DR: The mathematical model shows that modestly effective interventions to improve follow-up would likely be cost-effective, and priority should be given to developing and evaluating interventions addressing multiple points along the cascade rather than options focusing solely on single points.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consensus conference on the management of tumor lysis syndrome.

TL;DR: The current article reports the recommendations on the management of tumor lysis syndrome that were issued during a Consensus Conference project, and which were endorsed by the Italian Society of Hematology, the Italian Association of Pediatric Oncologists and the Italian society of Medical Oncology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of internet-based exposure treatment for irritable bowel syndrome in a clinical sample: a randomized controlled trial

TL;DR: ICBT proved to be a cost-effective treatment when delivered to a sample recruited from a gastroenterological clinic and the overall treatment effects were smaller than previous studies with referred and self-referred samples.
Journal ArticleDOI

Population Screening for Genetic Disorders in the 21st Century: Evidence, Economics, and Ethics

TL;DR: Current evidence-based processes used in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands are reviewed to assess genetic screening programs, including newborn screening, carrier screening, and organized cascade testing of relatives of patients with genetic syndromes.
Journal ArticleDOI

A study of the safety and harms of antidepressant drugs for older people: a cohort study using a large primary care database.

TL;DR: There was no evidence that SSRIs or drugs in the group of other antidepressants were associated with a reduced risk of any of the adverse outcomes compared with TCAs; however, they may be associated with an increased risk for certain outcomes.