scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The fourth edition of the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes as mentioned in this paper has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.
Abstract
The purpose of economic evaluation is to inform decisions intended to improve healthcare. The new edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes equips the reader with the necessary tools and understanding required to undertake evaluations by providing an outline of key principles and a 'tool kit' based on the authors' own experiences of undertaking economic evaluations. Building on the strength of the previous edition, the accessible writing style ensures the text is key reading for the non-expert reader, as no prior knowledge of economics is required. The book employs a critical appraisal framework, which is useful both to researchers conducting studies and to decision-makers assessing them. Practical examples are provided throughout to aid learning and understanding. The book discusses the analytical and policy challenges that face health systems in seeking to allocate resources efficiently and fairly. New chapters include 'Principles of economic evaluation' and 'Making decisions in healthcare' which introduces the reader to core issues and questions about resource allocation, and provides an understanding of the fundamental principles which guide decision making. A key part of evidence-based decision making is the analysis of all the relevant evidence to make informed decisions and policy. The new chapter 'Identifying, synthesising and analysing evidence' highlights the importance of systematic review, and how and why these methods are used. As methods of analysis continue to develop, the chapter on 'Characterising, reporting and interpreting uncertainty' introduces the reader to recent methods of analysis and why characterizing uncertainty matters for health care decisions. The fourth edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Characterizing Structural Uncertainty in Decision Analytic Models: A Review and Application of Methods

TL;DR: Only parameterizing the uncertainty directly in the model can inform the decision to conduct further research to resolve this source of uncertainty, and the value of research was particularly sensitive to these uncertainties and the methods used to characterize it.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring health-related quality of life in tuberculosis: a systematic review

TL;DR: The findings showed that tuberculosis had a substantial and encompassing impact on patients' quality of life, which persist after microbiological 'cure' and after patients successfully completed treatment and were microbiologically 'cured', their quality oflife remained significantly worse than the general population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins

TL;DR: The clinical effectiveness of both endovenous laser ablation and surgical treatment for varicose veins was compared within a randomized trial.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review

TL;DR: The result of this review is that the jury still is out on the HTA of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery, with emerging evidence shows that operating room time decreases with experience using the robot.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economics of medically unexplained symptoms: a systematic review of the literature.

TL;DR: Medically unexplained symptoms cause relevant annual excess costs in health care that are comparable to mental health problems like depression or anxiety disorders and which may be reduced by interventions targeting physicians as well as patients.